I reckon there is a bid on the table it’s just waiting for us to buy a striker. Once that happens the deal gets done.Because as Plods said, you’re advocating we just give in to what Isak is wanting and then supporting your point by saying Arsenal could do exactly the same with for example Tonali. Therefore, what message are we sending by giving in to Isak?
We don’t need to just move on. We need to make sure we don’t allow other clubs or agents or players to screw us over. Long term message not short term.
He’s not with the squad and if he continues to mess us around then we can look to recoup about £12M Pa from him in fines. His price won’t go down as he is a recognised goal scorer and not playing a short while isn’t going to affect his value. Reintegration is ultimately down to Isak but as soon as he plays and scores a lot of fans will forgive him. Throw in an apology and more will. I’m not saying keep him forever. I’m saying he goes when we want him to at a price we want and to a club that haven’t tried to shaft us.
Plus, and this seems to have been totally missed by a lot of people, nobody actually has a current bid in for Isak. So who exactly are we supposed to be selling him too? And before you suggest we approach the Victims that is a negotiating faux pa and guaranteed to reduce the price thereby vindicating what Isak, his Agent and the Victims have been doing. So, that’s a no-no.
Keep him for a season and sell him when we have better chance to adequately replace him.
There is no way back for Isak imho but that’s just my opinion. Ofc your entitled to yours also.
you judged Barnes before he even signed for us