Not seen enough of him to judge his pace but he's a much more intelligent player than larkeche and more experienced than EsquardinhioJust a question, does he have the pace for it?
Not seen enough of him to judge his pace but he's a much more intelligent player than larkeche and more experienced than EsquardinhioJust a question, does he have the pace for it?
Scratch that mate, Larkeche out for the foreseeable
https://www.westlondonsport.com/qpr/qpr-left-back-larkeche-out-for-several-months-with-knee-injury
Ffs! What on earth is going on at our club?!!
Do we now also have too many strikers?We’re jinxed. The season is only 1 game in FFS and we have a litany of injuries
Define "Strikers"Do we now also have too many strikers?
Define "Strikers"
Does anyone have any theories on why we're having so many injury problems the last few years? It just doesn't make sense. I'm pretty sure we're having way more issues with it than the average club.
Is it the playing surface at our training ground?
Surely it can't be the training regimes as they've changed so much with different coaching staff over the years.[/QUOTE
The season before last we had the least injuries of any team in the 4 leagues
However we had a policy of buying cheap old crocks
I’m sure I read somewhere that under the previous regime we signed injury prone players as they were cheaper. JCS? Willock?Does anyone have any theories on why we're having so many injury problems the last few years? It just doesn't make sense. I'm pretty sure we're having way more issues with it than the average club.
Is it the playing surface at our training ground?
Surely it can't be the training regimes as they've changed so much with different coaching staff over the years.
Thought the training ground was new so shouldn't be that?Does anyone have any theories on why we're having so many injury problems the last few years? It just doesn't make sense. I'm pretty sure we're having way more issues with it than the average club.
Is it the playing surface at our training ground?
Surely it can't be the training regimes as they've changed so much with different coaching staff over the years.
Does anyone have any theories on why we're having so many injury problems the last few years? It just doesn't make sense. I'm pretty sure we're having way more issues with it than the average club.
Is it the playing surface at our training ground?
Surely it can't be the training regimes as they've changed so much with different coaching staff over the years.
I agree, there is a definate element of players being tougher in previous era's. The speed and agility of players now is however far superior.The game has changed so much over the past 50 years as to be unrecognisable from that era. If my memory is right in 75-76 we only used 14 different players in our starting eleven all season, a few others were subs in a time when only one was allowed. Think about that in the modern era where so many players only play 60-70 minutes and with squad sizes often are rested every two or three games.
As well as that in the 70s our games were played on cabbage patches that often were mudheaps by December. Players didn't have the protection from refs modern ones do and the first 15 minutes often resembled a gbh festival as the hatchet men left their calling cards without even getting a booking. Yet despite that level of 'danger' long term injuries were fewer than the ridiculous levels today.
The only explanation has to be the training and fitness conditioning has reached a level were footballers are 'tuned' to such a level that they are 'on the edge' and the most innocuous challenge or just catching their studs on a turn can produce a season ending injury, likewise the explosive pace some produce can end with a torn hamstring which seems more common these days.
High fitness levels and athleticism trump talent in the modern game, the likes of Bowles, Worthington and their like would struggle to get game time in the modern era...
You've hit the nail on the head with that post.The game has changed so much over the past 50 years as to be unrecognisable from that era. If my memory is right in 75-76 we only used 14 different players in our starting eleven all season, a few others were subs in a time when only one was allowed. Think about that in the modern era where so many players only play 60-70 minutes and with squad sizes often are rested every two or three games.
As well as that in the 70s our games were played on cabbage patches that often were mudheaps by December. Players didn't have the protection from refs modern ones do and the first 15 minutes often resembled a gbh festival as the hatchet men left their calling cards without even getting a booking. Yet despite that level of 'danger' long term injuries were fewer than the ridiculous levels today.
The only explanation has to be the training and fitness conditioning has reached a level were footballers are 'tuned' to such a level that they are 'on the edge' and the most innocuous challenge or just catching their studs on a turn can produce a season ending injury, likewise the explosive pace some produce can end with a torn hamstring which seems more common these days.
High fitness levels and athleticism trump talent in the modern game, the likes of Bowles, Worthington and their like would struggle to get game time in the modern era...
The game has changed so much over the past 50 years as to be unrecognisable from that era. If my memory is right in 75-76 we only used 14 different players in our starting eleven all season, a few others were subs in a time when only one was allowed. Think about that in the modern era where so many players only play 60-70 minutes and with squad sizes often are rested every two or three games.
As well as that in the 70s our games were played on cabbage patches that often were mudheaps by December. Players didn't have the protection from refs modern ones do and the first 15 minutes often resembled a gbh festival as the hatchet men left their calling cards without even getting a booking. Yet despite that level of 'danger' long term injuries were fewer than the ridiculous levels today.
The only explanation has to be the training and fitness conditioning has reached a level were footballers are 'tuned' to such a level that they are 'on the edge' and the most innocuous challenge or just catching their studs on a turn can produce a season ending injury, likewise the explosive pace some produce can end with a torn hamstring which seems more common these days.
High fitness levels and athleticism trump talent in the modern game, the likes of Bowles, Worthington and their like would struggle to get game time in the modern era...
To be honest if you put amateur players under the microscope most would be told to sell their boots and take up dominoesYou've hit the nail on the head with that post.
Modern day footballers are measured on everything that you could imagine is measurable.
I see it on a weekly basis. Literally how high you can jump to to where you can bend your arm to.
The cost of injuries is also detrimental financially to a club as it's wasted wages. They are so fine tuned that they are seconds away from muscle strains.
Amateur footballers suffer much less and play week in week out. Put them under the microscope at a professional club and half of them would be told not to play next week due to something or other
To be honest if you put amateur players under the microscope most would be told to sell their boots and take up dominoes
