The Cricket Thread
- Thread starter TheSecondStain
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Won't particularly miss Pretorius and Brevis TBH when they go off to play for SA. Good players but Pretorius is a liability behind the stumps and they've both constantly thrown their wickets away. Wonder who we're getting in as replacements.
All we had to do was bat sensibly and we would have cruised that. 140 would have been plenty. Disgusted with that batting display.
It's one of those times where I hate to be right. After about 8 or 9 balls of the match, I thought 145 would be decent score. And nothing I saw in the remaining 38 and a bit overs changed my mind.
I just can't understand how so many of our batters - professional cricketers - didn't see it.
I just can't understand how so many of our batters - professional cricketers - didn't see it.
Middlesex not even close. When comparing the two teams, only Williamson would make the Surrey team. The rest of the Middlesex line-up would not make Surrey's third team. Men against Boys!!
Just to illustrate the chasm that there is between these two - Surrey's batters hit 10 sixes, while Middlesex's collective hit none!!
Just to illustrate the chasm that there is between these two - Surrey's batters hit 10 sixes, while Middlesex's collective hit none!!
Last edited:
This call to put India in to bat first is looking worse with every passing minute.
I do think this England side try to be too clever at times. It's a great wicket, in good conditions yet they choose not to bat because of 4th innings average scores.
I do think this England side try to be too clever at times. It's a great wicket, in good conditions yet they choose not to bat because of 4th innings average scores.
Gill said he would’ve fielded first as well .
Stoneman and Albert both dropped, but Prest retains his place.
Varma will obviously come in, and I presume that Orr will open with Middleton. So a top seven of something like: Middleton, Orr, Gubbins, Varma, Brown, Dawson, Prest.
No Wheal, so I assume he's injured. His absence, coupled with Currie's availability, means that we've a few different choices for which three bowlers will join Abbott. I think I might go with Currie, Turner and Jack. But I'd have no problem with Fuller. I don't think I'd go with Organ.
The fact that this is one of the games with the kookaburra ball should strengthen the case for Turner and Jack, rather than just one of them.
Varma will obviously come in, and I presume that Orr will open with Middleton. So a top seven of something like: Middleton, Orr, Gubbins, Varma, Brown, Dawson, Prest.
No Wheal, so I assume he's injured. His absence, coupled with Currie's availability, means that we've a few different choices for which three bowlers will join Abbott. I think I might go with Currie, Turner and Jack. But I'd have no problem with Fuller. I don't think I'd go with Organ.
The fact that this is one of the games with the kookaburra ball should strengthen the case for Turner and Jack, rather than just one of them.
Excuse my ignorance but where is Sonny Baker? Are England still requesting him to rest?
Got injured a few weeks ago, so had to miss the Lions series.
I did say there were a few different combinations regarding which three bowlers will join Kyle (and Liam).
But I wasn't expecting the combination which we've ultimately chosen. Feels like we're once again trying to compensate for a weak batting unit by batting deep.
But I wasn't expecting the combination which we've ultimately chosen. Feels like we're once again trying to compensate for a weak batting unit by batting deep.
I'm fine with it. Organ is a must pick at Chelmsford. Putting a lot of faith in Jack though - if he gets hit around the park we haven't got many other seam options to turn to. We could have done with winning the toss as well.
Former England and Gloucestershire legend “Syd” Lawrence has died at the age of 61. He was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease last year. He was the first black cricketer born in Britain to play for England.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/c07d973k0zzo
RIP Syd
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/c07d973k0zzo
RIP Syd
Former England and Gloucestershire legend “Syd” Lawrence has died at the age of 61. He was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease last year. He was the first black cricketer born in Britain to play for England.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/c07d973k0zzo
RIP Syd
MND is a complete **** of a disease. RIP.