Transfer Rumours 2024/25

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Sheff It'd to offer Dunne a contract according to WLS. Tough call in January not taking the cash but our league position was so precarious.

https://www.westlondonsport.com/qpr/sheffield-united-set-to-move-for-qpr-defender-dunne
The club can try to justify their decisions all they like but I don't believe a word of it. If they rated him, as we the fan base did, they would have offered a contract. If they didn't rate him why was it so crucial to keep him for the remainder of this season.
 
And why not?

Might be a great move rather than a part time bench warmer at the likes of City a la Grealish

He's not even that any longer. He was never quite as good as the press made him out to be just like Kalvin Phillips. And frankly it doesn't say much for Pep's judgment that he swallowed the hype around them
 
The club can try to justify their decisions all they like but I don't believe a word of it. If they rated him, as we the fan base did, they would have offered a contract. If they didn't rate him why was it so crucial to keep him for the remainder of this season.


We know nothing, I especially know nothing ..but my suspicion is.


1. We have offered him a contract but it is not good enough or long enough for what he/ his agents want.
2. We were ( probably correctly) fearful that without him we would be relegated.

He kept us up ...and that probably has given us more money staying in the Championship...than the money we would have got for him if we had sold in January.


I also suspect that Sheffield United did not go all out...as they would have been able to afford much better if they had been promoted ( I really don't think they would have been looking at him now if they had).

But to shore up a position in which they only had a loan player...is now sensible.
They can use the transfer money they saved to give him a better wage/ signing on fee etc
 
We know nothing, I especially know nothing ..but my suspicion is.


1. We have offered him a contract but it is not good enough or long enough for what he/ his agents want.
2. We were ( probably correctly) fearful that without him we would be relegated.

He kept us up ...and that probably has given us more money staying in the Championship...than the money we would have got for him if we had sold in January.


I also suspect that Sheffield United did not go all out...as they would have been able to afford much better if they had been promoted ( I really don't think they would have been looking at him now if they had).

But to shore up a position in which they only had a loan player...is now sensible.
They can use the transfer money they saved to give him a better wage/ signing on fee etc

Jimmy will more than double his money, we can't compete. Any of our better players who run their contracts down would do similar...
 
  • Like
Reactions: WBA2_QPR3
The club can try to justify their decisions all they like but I don't believe a word of it. If they rated him, as we the fan base did, they would have offered a contract. If they didn't rate him why was it so crucial to keep him for the remainder of this season.

He's had a contract offer on the table for ages. Club are damned if they do damned if they do with this fanbase.
 
He's had a contract offer on the table for ages. Club are damned if they do damned if they do with this fanbase.

Possibly but l think the general consensus with the members here, think the club spends less money every year, yet expects a better result.

Yes, l know we have restrictions, seemly forever in a day but is it just us?
Man City can spend a shedload, get busted, fight it and keep spending?

Would it be that we spend the least amount of coin each year in the Championship?
From a members point of view, whatever we could afford last season on players & manager, we must now spend less.
 
Possibly but l think the general consensus with the members here, think the club spends less money every year, yet expects a better result.

Yes, l know we have restrictions, seemly forever in a day but is it just us?
Man City can spend a shedload, get busted, fight it and keep spending?

Would it be that we spend the least amount of coin each year in the Championship?
From a members point of view, whatever we could afford last season on players & manager, we must now spend less.
We actually spent quite a bit last season on Madsen & Celar in comparison to previous years. We are where we are due to the poor running of the club stemming back to the Fernandes takeover. Things are said about Briatore but he knew what he wanted and actually achieved it. Nowadays we don't even know who owns/runs what, nevermind how much we can afford to spend.
 
We actually spent quite a bit last season on Madsen & Celar in comparison to previous years. We are where we are due to the poor running of the club stemming back to the Fernandes takeover. Things are said about Briatore but he knew what he wanted and actually achieved it. Nowadays we don't even know who owns/runs what, nevermind how much we can afford to spend.
It's a classic 'be careful what you wish for'. Most wanted Briatore gone, but he did get us to the PL as per his stated plan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobmid and MickMack
He was ruthless in getting there but he did what he said.
That’s a generous description of a man convicted of fraud, conspiracy and tax evasion, also banned for life from F1 for cheating, who spent years living in the Virgin Islands to avoid prison time in Italy. Presumably there were no ‘fit and proper person’ checks when he bought into the club.
 
I don’t think the current owners want to spend any more money than they currently do. I don’t blame them for that but it does mean we are in this perpetual cycle of mediocrity.
 
That’s a generous description of a man convicted of fraud, conspiracy and tax evasion, also banned for life from F1 for cheating, who spent years living in the Virgin Islands to avoid prison time in Italy. Presumably there were no ‘fit and proper person’ checks when he bought into the club.
Nobody was arsed about that when he took us up
 
  • Like
Reactions: MickMack
I don’t think the current owners want to spend any more money than they currently do. I don’t blame them for that but it does mean we are in this perpetual cycle of mediocrity.
Nobody could blame them to be fair. It's a club with no direction, no sellable assets and a running debt.
 
That’s a generous description of a man convicted of fraud, conspiracy and tax evasion, also banned for life from F1 for cheating, who spent years living in the Virgin Islands to avoid prison time in Italy. Presumably there were no ‘fit and proper person’ checks when he bought into the club.

They used Paladini as the front man but he was equally as dodgy
 
I don’t think the current owners want to spend any more money than they currently do. I don’t blame them for that but it does mean we are in this perpetual cycle of mediocrity.
They aren’t allowed to spend more money unless it’s generated by the club - renaming the ground or benefitting from Eze’s sell on clause etc. and we should know that better than most, we got the £40 million fine! The only way to dodge the three year FFP cycle is to get promoted and stay up, thus thwarting the EFL accountants by being in the prem. The system is broken because even when clubs do get promoted, they can’t compete with the established prem clubs. That’s why there are ten clubs like us at the bottom of the championship, hoping their youth team will come good but unable to buy the players they need.
 
They aren’t allowed to spend more money unless it’s generated by the club - renaming the ground or benefitting from Eze’s sell on clause etc. and we should know that better than most, we got the £40 million fine! The only way to dodge the three year FFP cycle is to get promoted and stay up, thus thwarting the EFL accountants by being in the prem. The system is broken because even when clubs do get promoted, they can’t compete with the established prem clubs. That’s why there are ten clubs like us at the bottom of the championship, hoping their youth team will come good but unable to buy the players they need.

Seems Financial 'Fair' Play is designed to keep the plebs in their place while the glamorous bigger clubs feed at the trough of PL money.

A broken system.
 
They aren’t allowed to spend more money unless it’s generated by the club - renaming the ground or benefitting from Eze’s sell on clause etc. and we should know that better than most, we got the £40 million fine! The only way to dodge the three year FFP cycle is to get promoted and stay up, thus thwarting the EFL accountants by being in the prem. The system is broken because even when clubs do get promoted, they can’t compete with the established prem clubs. That’s why there are ten clubs like us at the bottom of the championship, hoping their youth team will come good but unable to buy the players they need.

Will Sheffield United be in trouble now they failed to get promoted?