it shows up the ref and the assistant for not spotting the offenceRight decision though. Palace had players back. Makes a bit of a mockery of VAR that it clearly shows foul play but can’t do anything about it. Give a free kick on edge to City.
it shows up the ref and the assistant for not spotting the offenceRight decision though. Palace had players back. Makes a bit of a mockery of VAR that it clearly shows foul play but can’t do anything about it. Give a free kick on edge to City.
That’s justice. It was a dive. He was going down before the contact.thats a ****e decision by the ref and VAR
Thought VAR would overturn that. He caught him but just toed the ball first. Not one of those who think that just because he touched the ball it can’t be a penalty. In my view if he doesn’t divert the ball enough to stop the attacker continuing with the ball and then takes him out it is a penalty.He's on his way down before there's any contact.
The penalty was not a penalty. He dives. He was going down before the tackle.Thought VAR would overturn that. He caught him but just toed the ball first. Not one of those who think that just because he touched the ball it can’t be a penalty. In my view if he doesn’t divert the ball enough to stop the attacker continuing with the ball and then takes him out it is a penalty.
I always look for that and it looked good to me.Don’t understand why the penalty wasn’t reviewed. Thought Henderson had left his line before ball was struck.
Don’t understand why the penalty wasn’t reviewed. Thought Henderson had left his line before ball was struck.
his foot was in the air so from the angle they show,I always look for that and it looked good to me.
Yeh but you have only got one eye.I always look for that and it looked good to me.