would people be in favour of a stafe standing section at the mkm stadium

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

would be be in favour of safe standing at the mkm stadium

  • yes

    Votes: 52 94.5%
  • no

    Votes: 3 5.5%

  • Total voters
    55
Doesn't safe standing use rail seats providing the opportunity to still sit?

That is because they have to have that option in case they play games in European competitions, even if unlikely. Of course knowing Hull fans would get seats in that area as it would be the cheapest and then sit down and demand others did as they were blocking their view.<laugh>
In reality they are locked in position and can’t be folded down.
 
In this litigious world we live in, I'm surprised that clubs haven't put actual standing areas in rather than tolerating it in seated areas, which has to be the worst of all worlds and potentially far more expensive.

Where I see an issue is, if they have a safe standing area (how ****ing nannyfied does that sound) then there'll be less tolerance for people standing in other areas.

As we have found to our cost, despite what people claimed, forcing people to move is not a good idea, so the locations will be important.

Will it be a singing area as well. Another ridiculous phrase to apply in football grounds.
 
A group of fans singing in West Upper would definitely be heard. A small group made attempts to get things going on Saturday in West Upper. A pity more don’t do the same. No doubt the West Upper Stand rep will be complaining.

Yea but at least we wont have to see the away players always going to the away fans and having a little party as we lose yet another home game
 
Surely if you were going to do it you would have some kind of trial
probably a section of the North Stand

Seems to work well at other grounds but who would pay for it ?

The SMC presumably. Though FC could contribute as their fans would benefit as well.
 
No, not for me, spend the money elsewhere.

Do we have a problem with standing these days? It seems like those that want to stand have congregated in the same areas anyway so it’s not an issue.

The only reason for me is if you put it in areas to encourage more standing and improve the atmosphere, but that’s going to be expensive and in all likelihood wouldn’t work anyway.

And what would you spend the money on instead? Even more stewards, did you see the ridiculous over stewarding on Saturday, to kill the atmosphere even more? Trays on the seats so people can spend more time eating?
 
I’ve never been in a safe standing area where the seats are locked closed. Where does this happen?

Pretty sure you’re not allowed to lock them down in the UK, it reduces the width between the seat and the row in front breaching access regulations, I believe there’s different rules on the continent.

In terms of locking them up, it’s a bit pointless so no one does it.
 
Pretty sure you’re not allowed to lock them in the UK, it reduces the width between the seat and the row in front breaching access regulations, I believe there’s different rules on the continent.
That’s what I thought and what I have observed. It would be bizarre to make a seat available then prevent you from sitting on it at half time!
 
And what would you spend the money on instead? Even more stewards, did you see the ridiculous over stewarding on Saturday, to kill the atmosphere even more? Trays on the seats so people can spend more time eating?

Basic maintenance which the stadiums has been severely lacking over the years.

After that I’d optimise the concession stands which are painfully slow for fans, and costing the club revenue.
 
The safe standing at Derby away seemed ok to me. Is that rail seating? The question on the thread could alternatively be put as “would you object to sections of safe standing at the MKM?”. That way, those who wouldn’t use it could still not object. I suspect the question as it’s been put encourages those who are not interested in standing saying no to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger
How much is spent each year on the maintanance of the stadium?
Looks like it needs some
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger
We got a mention in an article sometime ago discussing the introduction of safe standing. Didn’t know the whole thing was started off by West Brom who were the first club to apply for safe standing and were turned down, That led to a campaign for its introduction.

“In extreme situations this can indeed lead to broken bones. Millions saw Marcus Rashford’s late winner for Manchester United at Hull City recently and the way that the United fans poured forward over the advertising board in celebration. An elderly female fan had to be helped back to her feet and at least one other fan broke his arm as a result of being pushed from behind and falling forward over the seats in front.

You must log in or register to see media

“Had that area been fitted with rail seats, fans couldn’t have surged forward over the seats, there would have been no collapse of the advertising hoarding, no lady knocked over and no broken bones. So, while the current practice of standing behind low-backed seats is safe 99% of the time, it is an undeniable fact that it is not as safe as it could be. Tens of thousands of fans stand every weekend in areas not designed for standing. It would be far better to ensure that the accommodation provided for them was truly fit for purpose.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD