British Politics spam thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Willhoops said:
Well if people want to do that they’d go to the source of the post wouldn’t they? To challenge the author rather than a copy and paster who has never had an original thought in your life.
Click to expand...

Wow, you're in direct contact with the author's of the reports and articles that you so often dismiss because of the journalist that reports on it. Post a few of the responses you got from them, I'm sure it'll be fascinating. <laugh>

GTF you tedious ****er. You post **** all but banal, attention seeking drivel, and never a meaningful response to the point at hand, as you've just demonstrated yet again. <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRH Custard VC
DMD said:
Wow, you're in direct contact with the author's of the reports and articles that you so often dismiss because of the journalist that reports on it. Post a few of the responses you got from them, I'm sure it'll be fascinating. <laugh>

GTF you tedious ****er. You post **** all but banal, attention seeking drivel, and never a meaningful response to the point at hand, as you've just demonstrated yet again. <doh>
Click to expand...

didn’t read but thanks.

To be fair calling you out as a tedious snide **** is hardly original, I’m sure it happens frequently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
Willhoops said:
didn’t read but thanks.

To be fair calling you out as a tedious snide **** is hardly original, I’m sure it happens frequently.
Click to expand...

That reads as though you're just talking to yourself to avoid having to express your view on the actual topic, and proving my point as well.

As fascinating as you clearly find me, and even though I'm on your mind 24/7, I'm really not the topic of this thread. HTH
 
DMD said:
That reads as though you're just talking to yourself to avoid having to express your view on the actual topic, and proving my point as well.

As fascinating as you clearly find me, and even though I'm on your mind 24/7, I'm really not the topic of this thread. HTH
Click to expand...

<laugh><laugh>




Didn’t read that either, guessing he’s triggered to **** as per.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pieguts and Toby
Every ****ing thing they touch. <doh>

No wonder the extreme left try so hard to avoid having to face the reality that what the rest of us were saying for ten years, was cock on.

Around 40 Labour MPs have met with the Treasury to voice their concerns over Rachel Reeves's family farm tax. The "rural growth group" held talks with the department on Thursday afternoon, days after thousands of farmers marched through Whitehall demanding the Government U-turn on its decision.

Full on Labour revolt over Rachel Reeves as 40 MPs send furious letters over tax plans
 
DMD said:
Can you imagine the meltdown if Labour had lost the election, and the party in power were doing what this shower of ****e are doing. <laugh>
Click to expand...
Yeah we would be posting articles about dog sex in the morning like the boring weirdos on here
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Weird that we don't get in depth psychological break downs of the influences, of the normal rapist murderers.

But he added that anyone who takes a close interest in Muhammad, a "poster boy for misogynists", could also be seen as a misogynist.

Ftfy
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back