Not in the slightest, I just don't see how charges nothing to do with these rules will be affected by this decision.
I've always been against these rules and want them scrapped. In no other walks of life can owners be limited to how much they can invest into their business. It ****ing stinks.
Plus the meltdown when they get off will be hilarious.
The problem is they are separate, but when 115 are revenue based and city have been restricted on building revenue for 3 years via unlawful APT rules then it's basically a closed book.

Come on QPR.
Help a brother.
Not in the slightest, I just don't see how charges nothing to do with these rules will be affected by this decision.
I've always been against these rules and want them scrapped. In no other walks of life can owners be limited to how much they can invest into their business. It ****ing stinks.
Plus the meltdown when they get off will be hilarious.
I get what your saying but capitalism does have various forms or regulation.
Everyone has to abide by the regulations otherwise they get penalised.
Be it the banks being dodgy, or me paying my PAYE late.
I get what your saying but capitalism does have various forms or regulation.
Everyone has to abide by the regulations otherwise they get penalised.
Be it the banks being dodgy, or me paying my PAYE late.
I've always been against these rules and want them scrapped. In no other walks of life can owners be limited to how much they can invest into their business. It ****ing stinks.
The thing is, there are owners. And then there are oil emirates.
Basically, City are owned/ran by Abu Dhabi and now Newcastle are ran by Saudia Arabia. Any other idea that it's individual owners is utter bollocks and we all know it.
Do people genuinely want to see a situation where clubs of this ilk can basically offer a million pounds a week to any player they want unhindered?
There have to be some form of restrictions.
They go about it the wrong way, the simplest thing would be a reasonable salary cap.
The thing is, there are owners. And then there are oil emirates.
Basically, City are owned/ran by Abu Dhabi and now Newcastle are ran by Saudia Arabia. Any other idea that it's individual owners is utter bollocks and we all know it.
Do people genuinely want to see a situation where clubs of this ilk can basically offer a million pounds a week to any player they want unhindered?
There have to be some form of restrictions.
They go about it the wrong way, the simplest thing would be a reasonable salary cap.
Some dude on here still smarting over being classed as a low cat poster….
^^^^^Agree with most of this but I suspect the average fan doesn't care how big clubs are outspending theirs.
I'm not sure why a fan of Ipswich would care that Man Utd can spend hundreds of millions more than them because they've grown as a club for the past 70 years whereas Man City are because they've been bought by a state. The outcome is the same, neither are what they'd probably see as "fair" we're just more used to one than the other.
The thing is, there are owners. And then there are oil emirates.
Basically, City are owned/ran by Abu Dhabi and now Newcastle are ran by Saudia Arabia. Any other idea that it's individual owners is utter bollocks and we all know it.
Do people genuinely want to see a situation where clubs of this ilk can basically offer a million pounds a week to any player they want unhindered?
There have to be some form of restrictions.
They go about it the wrong way, the simplest thing would be a reasonable salary cap.