Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
Ah, the bloke who attacked a female police officer, did time and now this patriot lives in Dubai

Not for me, he is just Susan Hall with a beard. May as well have Tate running for Mayor, the guy who owes HMRC millions and is locked away in is pad in Romania.

<laugh>

Another concerned 'Patriot' who thinks it's okay to attack the British police and mouth off about Muslims from his luxury pad in Dubai.

Just stick to being a fitness guru and stfu.
 
I think the point you’re missing is that Musk is pretty obviously a Hitler loving fascist.

And I’ve got your number btw.
Drop me a text then and I’ll put you in our prem board WhatsApp group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
I've no idea why anybody would want to go to a Taco bell, but they've obviously got a huge market in the US


Food trucks arnt cheap anymore, they cost as much as a regular restaurant. But why people go to Taco Bell over a better Mexican restaurant.

1) Laziness. Drive through. Instant food.
2) Familiarity.
3) Cheapness (it's cheaper than most Mexican places).
4) it's not Mexican. There is very little Mexican about Taco Bell... It has Mexican food names, but there is zero authenticity about it... In fact, in Mexico they advertise themselves as American style food.

I would say 50% of Americans have the food pallet of a 6 year old. They like bland flavours, no spice, little flavouring besides fat, sugar and salt. There's a reason crappy burgers and fries are the staple here... And Taco Bell makes bland tacos for bland American pallets.
 
Mike O'Leary of Ryanair, stuck the boot in to Rachel Reeves and Tim Martin <laugh>

He certainly don't hold back on anything that guy.
 
<laugh>

Another concerned 'Patriot' who thinks it's okay to attack the British police and mouth off about Muslims from his luxury pad in Dubai.

Just stick to being a fitness guru and stfu.
Yeh hes bit flagshaggy for my liking tbh

**** all that patriot **** I just want all the Muslims gone apart from spurly <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Mike O'Leary of Ryanair, stuck the boot in to Rachel Reeves and Tim Martin <laugh>

He certainly don't hold back on anything that guy.

like him, speaks out at the right time for publicity. He uses Stansted as his hub Airport I believe. Not sure how a rise or cut in passenger duty will help either way…..but got to love his open comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000 and brb
like him, speaks out at the right time for publicity. He uses Stansted as his hub Airport I believe. Not sure how a rise or cut in passenger duty will help either way…..but got to love his open comments but we will s.

I can't see this new runway happening in my lifetime, as Mike said, be lucky if it's even happening in 15 - 25 years time.

John McDonnell is against it (his area I think) along with Sadiq Khan, which I would certainly expect from the latter given his Green credentials regarding motorists.

I personally thought they were supposed to be doing something with Manston Airport, but like most other ocassions it's never happened or failed. So we have capacity at regional airports if you really want growth without all the planning applications hassle and something you can deliver quicker.

Although Manston is supposed to being opening as a cargo hub in 2027 but we will see....

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tiny-uk-airport-closed-10-34147197

The process of planning, construction, recruitment and completing the airspace change project is expected to take three years. The airport is set to be operational by 2027. Initially, Manston will operate solely as a cargo hub, but there are whispers that passenger flights could be introduced from 2028.

According to The Mirror, if the cargo side of the airport proves successful, passenger routes to countries such as the Netherlands, Spain, Cyprus and Malta could be established. It's reported that the airport's owners are in discussions with budget airlines like Ryanair and easyJet.

In the long term, plans over a 15-year period include having up to four passenger stands and 19 freight stands. RSP has stated that the project will create around 650 new jobs during the construction phase and 2,000 permanent jobs once it is fully operational.

Their website further stated: "The project requires no Government funding and has attracted several international investors who are prepared to invest £800m in this deprived part of the count
 
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see media
 
I’d have probably done it at Gatwick but then the **** do I know? Two runways for our main airport is a load of bollocks. Istanbul has six. Ooooh think of the local wildlife. Ooooh the noise in my village. Grow up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and brb
Well I haven't looked into it, but I know Sadiq Khan is one of the biggest ****s ever to have lived, so if he is against it, its probably the right thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see media
 
You must log in or register to see images

You must log in or register to see media
Thoughts on the Labour Party funding the redevelopment of Old Trafford and the surrounding area for their billionaire owner?
 
Thoughts on the Labour Party funding the redevelopment of Old Trafford and the surrounding area for their billionaire owner?

I think they are putting funding into developing the area, but I didn't think they are providing any money for the stadium redevelopment ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Make of this what you will mate

https://www.business-live.co.uk/eco...rts-manchester-uniteds-ambitious-30869555.amp

His office has described it as Britain's most substantial sports-led regeneration endeavour since the London 2012 Olympics.

'While United would oversee the stadium development, support from government would be needed in areas including enhanced transport infrastructure and residential development would be required.'

That's how I understood it when I was listening on the radio. Utd will pay for the stadium, but the Govt will invest in the surrounding area. I think their take is that it will create jobs, improve transport and provide housing etc. The levelling up, that the Tories never did <whistle>

Utd are still getting a good deal though, as when we built the Emirates, Arsenal had to pay for improved tube and transport links in and around the stadium.