Off Topic US election
- Thread starter flandersmackem
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Go and have a look at the press releases from the WHO over the last ten years. Have a look at their promotion of *****philia. If you still think they are a worthwhile organisation, then fair enough. I do not.
@Gordon Armstrong is deleting my posts again and if he does it with one more of my posts, this board is going to descend into the biggest chaos yet. The mong.
Last edited:
Not ruling stuff out as I'm unlikely to do the research right now, but 'promotion of *****philia' sounds like the sort of thing that arises from either malicious misunderstanding and extrapolation or attack lines from ideologically opposed groups. There's a lot who disagreed with the WHO stance on COVID that would happily transition to 'and another thing, they're all nonces' if they thought it provided validation to their beliefs.
They were pretty clear, and defended their stance. They advocated for " nine to twelve year olds to consciously decide on whether to have sex or not".
There is no ambiguity there. Nor is there in there extreme views on the transgender matter, where they openly disavow hundreds of years of proven, biological fact.
They are an overtly political animal now, and that is the sad fact
Saf
Most of us, if not all, know that you generally post on here to cause trouble, but please stop abusing/taking the mickey out of disabled people, like you did earlier and why I had to delete that extermely offensive post.
Most of us are decent people, who would not condone such abuse/name calling, so, again, please refrain from doing so
Most of us, if not all, know that you generally post on here to cause trouble, but please stop abusing/taking the mickey out of disabled people, like you did earlier and why I had to delete that extermely offensive post.
Most of us are decent people, who would not condone such abuse/name calling, so, again, please refrain from doing so
Go and **** yourself you prick. The only people I fall out with is you and your little clique.
Don’t give people sly likes about my family when you know they’re dead and then cry hard done by when I respond in kind.
Now for the last time leave my posts alone or I will destroy this place through your provocation and abuse of the mod tools.
'Hundreds of years of proven biological fact' is a political statement in itself though. There's nuance and grey that is not taken into account there - and is the reason why that particular subject remains an absolute powderkeg. On the original point, I'm afraid I can't take your post as evidence - and to be fair I'm not looking it up either. Not gonna use those search engine terms any time soon
. So while I won't rule it out, I've seen this dance so many times (wanton manipulation by idealogically opposed groups on everything from WHO to human rights law to EU and everything else in between) that I'm certainly not gonna be believing it to be true either.There's a conversation to be had about whether the WHO is fit for purpose. There's one about whether it is 'too political' too. However, most of the times people use too political as an attack line it's a fig leaf for 'I don't agree and want to shut that discussion down'. It's basically 'shut up and dribble' for global organisations. Everything is political to some extent.
I’ll take that back about the board @Gordon Armstrong - I’ve been on here for a while again now posting fine and conversing with people. Not sure why you think you speak on behalf of everyone on this forum. Nobody else should have to suffer because you’re being a prick with your mod tools. I’m also aware of some PM’s where you’ve been discussing me.
I’ve taken screenshots of all your friends and family on social media. I’ll message all of them and upset you that way.
I’ve taken screenshots of all your friends and family on social media. I’ll message all of them and upset you that way.
And people wonder why an Online Safety Act is coming in.
I was quite happy to stay out of this but your last paragraph is disgraceful.
Disgusting. Needs booting off here for that. That’s beyond the bounds that. I’ve been a twat on here I admit, been bollocked by the mods and apologised after, not that. Says a lot.
This board has a problem when we can't debate and have a difference of opinion, even big differences, without it breaking down into arguments and mod interference.
People have to make an effort to be more tolerant of the politics you don't like, this includes the likes of Trump, Starmer, George Galloway, Farage, Corbyn and so on.
People have to make an effort to be more tolerant of the politics you don't like, this includes the likes of Trump, Starmer, George Galloway, Farage, Corbyn and so on.
Shut up clown. You’re as bad as anyone on here.
If we wants to have sly digs in about me having no family he’s going to have to take the response that’s coming his way. Which it is. He’s pushed it too far now.
Mate, I really have no idea why you and Gordon are mortal enemies and to be honest I don’t want to know. But what you both are is Sunderland supporters. Surely that has to count for something? A shared bond maybe? Can both of you not sort out your differences without resorting to this?
Thanks for being the voice of reason and not believing the ****e he spread about me not supporting the lads.
Everything has been fine on here, some bad things were sad last night on here which he left alone and then as soon as I said something he’s editing and deleting my comments again.
What am I supposed to do? He’s got the mod tools so I have to find a way to get him back. That’s just the way I am.
'Hundreds of years of proven biological fact' is a political statement in itself though. There's nuance and grey that is not taken into account there - and is the reason why that particular subject remains an absolute powderkeg. On the original point, I'm afraid I can't take your post as evidence - and to be fair I'm not looking it up either. Not gonna use those search engine terms any time soon
There's a conversation to be had about whether the WHO is fit for purpose. There's one about whether it is 'too political' too. However, most of the times people use too political as an attack line it's a fig leaf for 'I don't agree and want to shut that discussion down'. It's basically 'shut up and dribble' for global organisations. Everything is political to some extent.
Okay, no bother to me. Don't believe it.