The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Reckless, uncontrolled, no effort to play the ball, through the back of the player, and potentially very dangerous indeed.
There are two criteria for that to be a red card:

1. Excessive force or brutality - not for me.
2. Endangering the safety of an opponent - maybe but IMO the VAR was right not to recommend a review. Wouldn't call it clear and obvious.
 
Endangering an opponent is a red though and I don't see how that doesn't fit that category.
Possibly but not clear and obvious. One referee's opinion will be different to another here and I don't think VAR should be intervening here.
 
Possibly but not clear and obvious. One referee's opinion will be different to another here and I don't think VAR should be intervening here.

Well this is the problem with VAR as I've said all along. Clear and obvious is itself subjective. For me that's almost as clear as they come in terms of endangering an opponent.

Interestingly I was looking at a Leicester forum earlier and the consensus there was that they were very lucky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ......loading......