Starmer is also the fourth Prime Minister since Boris Johnson resigned over the scandals involving him.
****ing hell, the lefties are a psychologists dream. They're a case study in gaslighting, mirroring, projection and delusion just as the easy ones.
That would exclude you then ... the only 'ology' you're proficient in appears to be right bias knee-jerk reflexology
The easily led have proved themselves on here, but they are drawing in more intelligent people too. Stopme is in their web, by the look of it.
I personally don't give a monkey's if Starmer's kid used a flat to revise in or someone bought his missus some knickers but if rules have been broken then this needs to be addressed and without reference to any other ex-Prime Minister and what they did.
aand still the lefties favour fantasy over facts as they once again trundle off arguing against points of their own creation.
They should make it clear: there are no asylum seekers coming across the Channel and none should be treated as such.
Especially if the person doing these things pilloried others, and set themselves up as the bastion of morality, yet is himself a proven liar.
No, that's as maybe but just deal with facts. If he broke a rule then he must answer questions, if he didn't then he needn't.
I agree in principle, however I do think the context is important, because of the messages he pushed to get himself as leader and then when running for election. His answers so far have been shown to be untruthful, which all combined show him to be deceitful and dishonest and ended up revealing even more sleaze. That shows him to be a poor politician. They're not uncommon traits in politicians, but he did put himself on a pedestal over those very issues, so needed to be beyond reproach. His responses have also revealed the man's arrogance and contempt for anyone with differing views, and shown him to be out of touch with the electorate, and even with his own party.
You just hate the guy. For that we are truly grateful, watching your last 2 months of ranting about him.
We just need to store energy when the wind is blowing or the sun is shining, job's a good un: https://www.thetimes.com/article/so...e vast majority, 73 per,fields at 19 per cent.
Oh okay, you've grafted hard, so here's some acknowledgment that you exist. You are hooked on personalities, and seem to assume everyone else does to. That's why you are so off kilter in your views. I'm not keen on some weak, dishonest hypocrite damaging the country. You and yours clearly don't like this Country you live in, so don't mind it getting wrecked. HTH
True, all it would need would be for effective technology to exist, and to find a new way of producing food and space for housing, et viola.
