For the avoidance of doubt, as has been mentioned, OBR and Government finance data is in the public domain. Monthly public finances release Every month the Treasury and Office for National Statistics produce a joint statistical bulletin on the latest public finances data. On the same day the OBR will provide a brief analysis of the data, explaining how it should be interpreted in light of our most recent public finances forecast for the current year. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes a full list of public sector finances release dates and previous monthly data reports will be available on this page. https://obr.uk/monthly-public-finances-briefing/
Yup, there's plenty of evidence, and Sunak was calling it out pre-election too. Starmer is a proven liar on this, and on other issues. He's a politician so it's to be expected, although anyone just going by the mainstream media is liable to miss quite a lot of it.
Impeccable timing, just as people are showing his claims were false so it wasn't an 'honest assessment'.
So we haven’t got a major black hole in our finances then…good to know, it least it means you won’t now be whining everyday…every cloud and all that
Have we got a £20B black hole or not. If we have it’s an honest assessment, if we haven’t it’s lies. Make your mind up brains
If a body of work has the words Keir, or Starmer, in it, it instantly becomes a falsehood. 2 of The 10 Gammandments Thou shalt not believe Keir Starmer. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's Starmer.
*sigh* let's just put the goal posts back where they were. Did you listen to his speech, where he claimed nobody knew? Have you seen the evidence from several sources, including the ones he quote showing his claim was false? That clearly means that he lied in his speech, so it wasn't the 'honest assessment you claimed. He's having to lie to justify his payments abroad, his collapse to the unions and theft from pensioners.
Something's not right, and I'm thinking the £22B now is a different black hole, only reason I say that, is because I remember something about it being announced on the 29th July by Reeves, and thinking then it was a different hole in the economy. I could be wrong, that don't bother me, but something not quite adding up. I know Sunak said that Kier would have to raise taxes by x amount per family in one of their debates, so this is why I'm thinking this is a different £20B+ we are talking about now. Trouble is as per usual DMD is like a ferret up a drain pipe and thinks nowt through and starts windmilling the comments, normally to cause confusion to avoid seeing through the lies, this is what he did with 30p Lee, then wonders why people won't discuss with him properly.
If the Office of Budget Responsibility lost track of £20 billion, I think there'd be a bit more of an outcry.
Beth is saying the £20b is due to them paying the public sector wage rises, which is different to keefs claim, and more in line with the other claims I have mentioned.
On the actual point in question, you were wrong yet again, as the evidence clearly shows. Maybe if you tried to discuss rather than challenge based on some long failed fantasy versions of posters, you may just learn a thing or two.
Thou shall not join riots with racists (as there were no racists at the riots, just salt-of-the-earth innocent Englishmen that just happened to try to burn down a hotel full of asylum seekers)
Do you have any more fake news to post, that just ends up showing how bad your heroes are? It's becoming quite a habit for you.
