Euro 24
- Thread starter NostradEmus
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Well the ref does like a bung, looks like big nose offered more than koeman
Kane got the shot off but was caught by raised studs in box so a penalty.
There's only gary neville talking sense...
Because he agrees with me
You're talking like that clown Ian Wright Wakey
We are the Champions, Champions of Europe.
I’ve sung it a hundred times with no shame, I believe it, we were robbed and, likely, most teams around Europe won’t begrudge us that.
Im not an England fan in the way Chesh is but, I wouldn’t want to see us win this tournament on the back of that decision, it was diabolical and ruins football for everyone. Can you imagine celebrating an England victory on the back of that? I honestly can’t.
I’ve sung it a hundred times with no shame, I believe it, we were robbed and, likely, most teams around Europe won’t begrudge us that.
Im not an England fan in the way Chesh is but, I wouldn’t want to see us win this tournament on the back of that decision, it was diabolical and ruins football for everyone. Can you imagine celebrating an England victory on the back of that? I honestly can’t.
On the penalty....
There is a difference between what you think the rules SHOULD be and what the rules ARE.
The rules state that leading with the studs is reckless play and is punishable with a free kick (penalty) and possible red and yellow card. That's why it was a penalty.
Do I agree with this rule? No. For me it should have been an acceptable attempt to block the shot but that's not what the rules are in today's game.
Game has been non contact for a while.
There is a difference between what you think the rules SHOULD be and what the rules ARE.
The rules state that leading with the studs is reckless play and is punishable with a free kick (penalty) and possible red and yellow card. That's why it was a penalty.
Do I agree with this rule? No. For me it should have been an acceptable attempt to block the shot but that's not what the rules are in today's game.
Game has been non contact for a while.
Not me bruv.There's only gary neville talking sense...
Because he agrees with me
You're talking like that clown Ian Wright Wakey
