I like him, but he’s not my lover, but maybe he is the one.Just so I can do a Michael Jackson song chant, I’m in.
EDIT: it may happen as randomly this morning I put on the Thriller album and listened to that song 3 times
I like him, but he’s not my lover, but maybe he is the one.Just so I can do a Michael Jackson song chant, I’m in.
If Brighton want him I suggest we ****ing outbid them.
You must log in or register to see media
If Brighton want him I suggest we ****ing outbid them.
You must log in or register to see media
He looks like a weed, Worse than Smallbone.
He looks like a weed, Worse than Smallbone.
You aren't wrong of course but I'm going to be a little pedantic as I would say that "Giving youth a chance," in football parlance, implies youth that you have nurtured and helped improve rather than recently bought from City or Chelsea as nearly finished articles. It's true that a young player looking for opportunities elsewhere is likely to see us as a team that will showcase them. I don't think the same is true for our own homegrown talent any more, and considering the reputation we once had for doing just that, it's a sorry state of affairs - and an expensive one.But we don't know they are good enough unless we sign them, as we are buying youngsters that have never played mens football or at least not at this level.
Lavia - Regular starter
Tino - Regular starter
Bazunu - Regular starter
Edozie - Rotation option, 49 apps in 2 seasons
Larios - Not really played, injuries not helped.
Charles - 32 apps in first season
SAA - signed at 16, made debut but not had much chance since.
We spent almost £50m on that lot and only Baz had ever played mens football. That is taking a massive risk and if that isn't giving youth a chance then I don't know what is!
This is what I was trying to say!You aren't wrong of course but I'm going to be a little pedantic as I would say that "Giving youth a chance," in football parlance, implies youth that you have nurtured and helped improve rather than recently bought from City or Chelsea as nearly finished articles. It's true that a young player looking for opportunities elsewhere is likely to see us as a team that will showcase them. I don't think the same is true for our own homegrown talent any more, and considering the reputation we once had for doing just that, it's a sorry state of affairs - and an expensive one.
Yeah I'd agree with that. I thought the conversation started with reference as to whether we are a good destination for young players looking for a club that will give them a chance. I kind of feel like this is partly why our own young players have struggled to break through, as we keep blocking the pathway by signing other 18-20 year olds and playing them.You aren't wrong of course but I'm going to be a little pedantic as I would say that "Giving youth a chance," in football parlance, implies youth that you have nurtured and helped improve rather than recently bought from City or Chelsea as nearly finished articles. It's true that a young player looking for opportunities elsewhere is likely to see us as a team that will showcase them. I don't think the same is true for our own homegrown talent any more, and considering the reputation we once had for doing just that, it's a sorry state of affairs - and an expensive one.
I wouldn't say so. "Giving young players a chance" is slightly different from "giving academy players a chance". These days, teams are buying young players from other teams all the time. So I think the phrase "giving young players a chance" no longer applies to just your own academy talents.You aren't wrong of course but I'm going to be a little pedantic as I would say that "Giving youth a chance," in football parlance, implies youth that you have nurtured and helped improve rather than recently bought from City or Chelsea as nearly finished articles. It's true that a young player looking for opportunities elsewhere is likely to see us as a team that will showcase them. I don't think the same is true for our own homegrown talent any more, and considering the reputation we once had for doing just that, it's a sorry state of affairs - and an expensive one.
My understanding is that due to the larger clubs hoovering up much of the best young talent that it has been necessary to have a blended model that allows both our academy players to come through but also to allow us to bring in young talent that has been nurtured at other academies to play regular football and develop further and move on to the bigger clubs for decent fees.I wouldn't say so. "Giving young players a chance" is slightly different from "giving academy players a chance". These days, teams are buying young players from other teams all the time. So I think the phrase "giving young players a chance" no longer applies to just your own academy talents.
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see media

If these numbers are to be believed Saints will have made a combined loss over the previous 3 seasons of £38m, and we are allowed to lose up to £83m.Here's an article on Saints FFP situation...
https://www.southamptonfc.news/news...an-invest-this-summer-amid-83m-ffp-situation/
If these numbers are to be believed Saints will have made a combined loss over the previous 3 seasons of £38m, and we are allowed to lose up to £83m.