Election 2024

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How are Labour doing after their first 12 months


  • Total voters
    23
You know, its never struck me until now

I've never actually seen Farage talking about normal policies like this.

Like benefits, the economy etc

its always migrants
Dont think hes had to before has he. Just peddled the immigration and brexit thing innit
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE and Welshie
I agree with that. Just wouldnt celebrate a couple of old men getting chinned in front of the wives and kids by a gang of young lads, the way you and Sucky are doing.

I just wanna see Andrew Tate take a pikey pummelling
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
You must log in or register to see media

Just ****ing hilarious.

After 14 years of our government making everything more expensive you sinpky cannot afford to have another different government.

<laugh><doh>
 
Same mentality with Trump. He might have tried to start an insurrection, lied about sleeping with a hooker, paid her hush money and stolen confidential documents. But that’s all a democrat conspiracy to stop Trump from exposing them all as blood drinking peados


Yeah, but Yanks though. There’s something very weird going on with that.
 
Mainly agree with most of that.

Farage doesn’t need his figures to add up. He knows that. This election and the next few years will be all about building up a supporter base. He’ll say whatever he needs to because he’s not being properly scrutinised until he’s genuinely a contender in an election.

As for going private with over our health. I’ve banged that drum for well over a decade now. It doesn’t work in its current form. It needs help financially and if that means going through some sort of insurance or pay at the point of service then so be it if it will run more efficiently.

It'll be a slippery slope Saf. Once we go private with our 'hands on' care then all accountability is lost. The level and quality will become the lowest common denominator dictated by cost for the provider and dividends for the shareholders. We'll have people being treated like asset/expenditure rather than patients.

Also add, the basic level of cover will be x, y, z but anything over and above in the fine print will be extra. This happens in the French system Farage is quoting - there's basic cover, then you pay more for the extra cover and if you don't have that you pay out of your pocket.

I knew that the France system is also more expensive and a quick google shows that in the 10 yrs prior to covid the French system had 20% more spending per person than the NHS. If we'd matched that per person we'd have an extra £40bn which could help the consultant shortfalls and better primary care.
https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-...ng-compare-across-europe-over-the-past-decade

When we should be nationalising services which the private sector have fcked up, this would be the wrong way to go with the NHS and once it's done we'll never go back.
 
It'll be a slippery slope Saf. Once we go private with our 'hands on' care then all accountability is lost. The level and quality will become the lowest common denominator dictated by cost for the provider and dividends for the shareholders. We'll have people being treated like asset/expenditure rather than patients.

Also add, the basic level of cover will be x, y, z but anything over and above in the fine print will be extra. This happens in the French system Farage is quoting - there's basic cover, then you pay more for the extra cover and if you don't have that you pay out of your pocket.

I knew that the France system is also more expensive and a quick google shows that in the 10 yrs prior to covid the French system had 20% more spending per person than the NHS. If we'd matched that per person we'd have an extra £40bn which could help the consultant shortfalls and better primary care.
https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-...ng-compare-across-europe-over-the-past-decade

When we should be nationalising services which the private sector have fcked up, this would be the wrong way to go with the NHS and once it's done we'll never go back.

I'm not reading all that, no fooking way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
It'll be a slippery slope Saf. Once we go private with our 'hands on' care then all accountability is lost. The level and quality will become the lowest common denominator dictated by cost for the provider and dividends for the shareholders. We'll have people being treated like asset/expenditure rather than patients.

Also add, the basic level of cover will be x, y, z but anything over and above in the fine print will be extra. This happens in the French system Farage is quoting - there's basic cover, then you pay more for the extra cover and if you don't have that you pay out of your pocket.

I knew that the France system is also more expensive and a quick google shows that in the 10 yrs prior to covid the French system had 20% more spending per person than the NHS. If we'd matched that per person we'd have an extra £40bn which could help the consultant shortfalls and better primary care.
https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-...ng-compare-across-europe-over-the-past-decade

When we should be nationalising services which the private sector have fcked up, this would be the wrong way to go with the NHS and once it's done we'll never go back.
apart from the fact that nearly every country that has a system like that outperforms the NHS and most by a long way .
 
apart from the fact that nearly every country that has a system like that outperforms the NHS and most by a long way .

But they spend more on it.

You'd also need to see what they gauge performance on.

Btw wasn't the NHS the best healthcare system in the world up until 2010 and that was also due to spending per head. I hear this and if true then that's what's needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
But they spend more on it.

You'd also need to see what they gauge performance on.

Btw wasn't the NHS the best healthcare system in the world up until 2010 and that was also due to spending per head. I hear this and if true then that's what's needed.
No though probably the most efficient .

It would help if we decided what the NHS has to do and do well and get rid of the extraneous stuff they do .
 
Don’t leave a graze on him. What the **** is whacking him with a flip-flop going to do?
In some cultures throwing shoes is the height of disrespect.

Maybe they was just tryna make him feel at home i dunno
 
It'll be a slippery slope Saf. Once we go private with our 'hands on' care then all accountability is lost. The level and quality will become the lowest common denominator dictated by cost for the provider and dividends for the shareholders. We'll have people being treated like asset/expenditure rather than patients.

Also add, the basic level of cover will be x, y, z but anything over and above in the fine print will be extra. This happens in the French system Farage is quoting - there's basic cover, then you pay more for the extra cover and if you don't have that you pay out of your pocket.

I knew that the France system is also more expensive and a quick google shows that in the 10 yrs prior to covid the French system had 20% more spending per person than the NHS. If we'd matched that per person we'd have an extra £40bn which could help the consultant shortfalls and better primary care.
https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-...ng-compare-across-europe-over-the-past-decade

When we should be nationalising services which the private sector have fcked up, this would be the wrong way to go with the NHS and once it's done we'll never go back.

Farage wants to sell it off to Trump’s mates and no doubt packet a tidy sum himself in the process.

You can take the stockbroker out of Clacton …..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky