First they said it was 100% effective. This was a lie. The vaccine certainly wasn’t effective. It didn’t stop transmission.
Then they said it’s 100% safe. It’s not, and they’re finally admitting that it’s not safe. (It’s much much worse than they’re admitting currently by the way).
I was right about both. Thanks.
It was never claimed, and it's good for every vaccine, to be 100% safe or effective at any point, your post is a lie, totally misleading. Oh by the way vaccines play a part in reducing transmission by preventing infection or reducing viral load. You were wrong then and are now, there will be no great 'revelation'.
Posting this will have no effect on your delusions or is it wind ups, but may be of interest to others.
https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/...-vaccines-initial-approval-pfizer-2024-02-12/
"Social media users (AKA crackpot conspiraloons) are circulating video clips of testimony by a Pfizer executive, who is said to “admit” that the company and its partner BioNTech did not test whether their mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine reduced virus transmission prior to rolling it out – which is something the companies were not required to do for initial regulatory approval, nor did they claim to have done.
To get emergency approval, companies needed to show that the vaccines were safe and prevented vaccinated people from getting ill. They did not have to show that the vaccine would also prevent people from spreading the virus to others. Once the vaccines were on the market, independent researchers in multiple countries studied people who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and did show that vaccination reduced transmission of variants circulating at the time.
As these results on transmission were emerging in early 2021, national health authorities in many countries implemented or proposed vaccine-passport-style regulations that prompted ongoing debate (
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi5245, opens new tab) over the ethical and legal basis of the rules.
The misleading posts imply that national restrictions such as vaccine passports were based on a promise of vaccines blocking virus spread that neither the companies nor EU regulators made before the vaccines were marketed."
There's lots more involving transmission reduction here including.
"VACCINE DID REDUCE TRANSMISSION
Within months of the vaccine hitting the market, researchers in the UK (
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-tra-idUKKBN2AQ1A7) and Israel (
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762, opens new tab(21)00127-7/fulltext) began publishing studies suggesting that the Pfizer vaccine was reducing transmission of the virus.
In February 2021, for example, Israeli data (
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736, opens new tab(21)00448-7/fulltext) showed a sharp drop in infections among healthcare workers within 15-28 days of receiving the two-shot Pfizer vaccine series, indicating the vaccine was not just preventing symptomatic disease, but also preventing the virus from being passed from person to person.