It's fine, it'll allow 17 year old Tommy McTwoleftfeet to get the game time he deserves and when Leicester get relegated again that'll be good news too.
Wouldn't get too excited ... apparently Bayern and Barcelona are also interested... particularly the latter due to him being available on a free and them not having funds for transfers ... he's been very good this season, Maresca has him playing a more advanced role than he's ever done before and he's weighed in with more goals / assists than he's ever managed before ... and our little wobble coincided with him being injured ... him and Ricardo Pereira ...
They sound good to me, edwards has the midas touch when it comes to turning profits so we should be fine. Its the cheaters city and over spenders utd and the chavs who dont want it.
with Klopps record of developing players purchased for small transfer fees. Will be a free run to more PL titles for him.
Kicking someone in the bollocks isn't a foul though. Testicles aren't mentioned anywhere in the FA rules.
It's only a vote in principle and the Premier League are now putting together the finer details for a final vote in June....one of the details in question is the multiple figure of the bottom clubs revenue.... some saying it will be x 4.5. I don't understand why the likes of Villa voted against?
