Match Day Thread Huddersfield v Hull City

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

City win?

  • City

  • Draw

  • Huddersfield


Results are only viewable after voting.
That can't happen if he's getting splinters from the bench.

But we can't afford to sit and wait for his sharpness/form to come in the position we're in, especially if we have a player who gives more who could start in his place
 
Ohio seemed an odd signing to me, meaning an unproven young 20/21 year old when we needed a CF to help a promotion push. Unless there is a chance of signing him permanently.
But tbf I think he's looked quite promising so far.
I simply don't get the derogatory comments.
 
Ohio seemed an odd signing to me, meaning an unproven young 20/21 year old when we needed a CF to help a promotion push. Unless there is a chance of signing him permanently.
But tbf I think he's looked quite promising so far.
I simply don't get the derogatory comments.

I don't either, he's very raw and I really think he's just being a tad to enthusiastic at times, which isn't helping him.... But a certain other young unproven CF who came to us in the champ and really helped with promotion was exactly the same
 
Ohio seemed an odd signing to me, meaning an unproven young 20/21 year old when we needed a CF to help a promotion push. Unless there is a chance of signing him permanently.
But tbf I think he's looked quite promising so far.
I simply don't get the derogatory comments.
There has to be somebody to slag off, gives the others a rest for a while. :emoticon-0100-smile
 
Don't think anyone can reasonably claim anything definitive having only played 83 mins in 3 appearances so far, other than that a goal in those 83 minutes is a better strike rate that Delap, Connolly or Sharp currently.

In one breath you claim small sample and then you use it to suggest something that makes no sense. <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ehab's Member
In one breath you claim small sample and then you use it to suggest something that makes no sense. <laugh>

Not if the general point is that it could go either way yet. We simply don't know either way. But it is relevant that he's done what sharp hasn't, having been given a fair bit more opportunity.
 
Not if the general point is that it could go either way yet. We simply don't know either way. But it is relevant that he's done what sharp hasn't, having been given a fair bit more opportunity.

I would hope he has offered more than a 38 year old, it's an incredibly low bar.
 
I would hope he has offered more than a 38 year old, it's an incredibly low bar.

FFS, it was a comment in relation to gwfaw and ehabs member.

He's played very little, but scored and shown glimpses - but there's nothing like enough game time or even time with the squad to make a judgment either way yet.

I apologise, I had no idea that was so controversial... Jeez!
 
FFS, it was a comment in relation to gwfaw and ehabs member.

He's played very little, but scored and shown glimpses - but there's nothing like enough game time or even time with the squad to make a judgment either way yet.

I apologise, I had no idea that was so controversial... Jeez!

That's an odd reaction, I was merely saying that claiming he's shown more than Sharp is entirely expected. No need to be so reactive.
 
That's an odd reaction, I was merely saying that claiming he's shown more than Sharp is entirely expected. No need to be so reactive.
Says he who mocked a post suggesting his goals per minutes is better than anyone else's just now.

Then immediately got on the defensive about derogatory posts that weren't ever referring to you.

If only you could see yourself sometimes...
 
Says he who mocked a post suggesting his goals per minutes is better than anyone else's just now.

Then immediately got on the defensive about derogatory posts that weren't ever referring to you.

If only you could see yourself sometimes...

Mocked? What on earth are you on about?

As I've said, I'm happy for someone to quote said derogatory posts since (as I already acknowledged) I'm sure the post wasn't referring to me. :)
 
Mocked? What on earth are you on about?

As I've said, I'm happy for someone to quote said derogatory posts since (as I already acknowledged) I'm sure the post wasn't referring to me. :)

Coming in with laughing emojis and saying something's nonsensical (despite being factual) after not being part of the preceding convo does set a kina mocking tone, yes.

But calling him a donkey after a first **** touch was fairly derogatory to be fair