I absolutely agree. He’s prime age and is a very good player.The agists will disagree but I'd give Barkley a season or two here... he's far superior to ****e like longstaff..
20m would get him aswell.
I absolutely agree. He’s prime age and is a very good player.The agists will disagree but I'd give Barkley a season or two here... he's far superior to ****e like longstaff..
I absolutely agree. He’s prime age and is a very good player.
20m would get him aswell.
WrongI absolutely agree. He’s prime age and is a very good player.
20m would get him aswell.
And what’s that to do with being wrong about getting him for £20m?He's a good player
Luton will get relegated this season and we can buy him. For 20m (plus performance related bonuses).Wrong
He only signed a 1 year contract with Luton. He’ll be available on a freeLuton will get relegated this season and we can buy him. For 20m (plus performance related bonuses).
So maybe not as wrong as you claim.
And what’s that to do with being wrong about getting him for £20m?
Even better. Get it sorted.He only signed a 1 year contract with Luton. He’ll be available on a free
They play different positions. As a cheap no10/8 then yes he’d be greatEven better. Get it sorted.
Hes a very good player.
Honest question. Do we think he’s better than Longstaff?
Bournemouth were unlucky to not be 3 up at half time.... we got lucky Yesterday
Thought you said there was no such thing as luck?
No I said you can't put everything down to luck ...I was saying injuries are not just luck.
Nope, that's not what you said, but frankly I can't be arsed to debate this for hours with you
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Grow the **** up ...
Interesting response just because you made a false claim. I suppose the other option was to say fair enough but you don't have it in you.
All I did was show you mate.