How many >3 goal spankings have Norwich had...![]()
Oh yes and we won at Wolves, Stoke, Everton which i cannot see you doing, infact you have only won once away this season.
I also don't see you beating Chelsea or scoring 2 goal against Man City.
So you could say i would take the 3 goal spankings because even with 3 goal spankings we have done better than you so far.
Muppet
Oh yes and we won at Wolves, Stoke, Everton which i cannot see you doing, infact you have only won once away this season.
I also don't see you beating Chelsea or scoring 2 goal against Man City.
So you could say i would take the 3 goal spankings because even with 3 goal spankings we have done better than you so far.
Muppet
Will admit Morrison has done better than I expected, and a bit like the earlier post I did is probably underrated by opposition fans.
But still would be surprised if he bully's our defence on sat

just to add to what rob said, we have played man utd, chelsea and liverpool away from home so we were hardly likely to win any of them! qpr's result against chelsea was one of the biggest farces i've seen in football - i dread to think what the score would have been 11v11!! they totally and utterly spanked you in all but score line but credit to you for hanging on. qpr's away results have been impressive but they beat stoke who are playing rubbish and conceding loads, everton who are having their usual early season flirt with the drop zone before finally getting their act together and your win at wolves was certainly a tremendous performance. in my opinion there is very little between our teams at present... that could change in january when you throw your money about but its barking mad to suggest that somehow rangers are streets ahead of city at this moment in time
Norwich played better against us than Rangers did. They tried to play football, rangers tried to kick us off the park and to their credit it worked.
Think Rangers should stay up though, but they don't play football the right way; Warnock's sides rarely do
Strangely enough, when it was 11v11 we were much the better side; when it went to 11v9 Chelsea threw caution to the wind and we didn't seem to know how to deal with that. It was a tactical dilemma. Result clearly shows that we won fairly and don't make me laugh about who was trying to kick who off the park; Chelsea got 2 reds and 7 yellows as opposed to two yellows for QPR.
Ellars has a puppet fetish
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
partly agree with that - chelsea completely lost their discipline and deserved to lose for that reason alone, though chelsea were far the better team over the 90 minutes. qpr do play decent football under warnock from what i've seen. sure they can mix it up when needed but so can we! sign of a decent team being able to adapt to different styles when required.
partly agree with that - chelsea completely lost their discipline and deserved to lose for that reason alone, though chelsea were far the better team over the 90 minutes. qpr do play decent football under warnock from what i've seen. sure they can mix it up when needed but so can we! sign of a decent team being able to adapt to different styles when required.