P
Prehab26
Guest
Just give him the new deal he wants and deserves. Play him in the right position.
Not difficult.
Winter transfer window
- Thread starter mick65
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Just give him the new deal he wants and deserves. Play him in the right position.
Not difficult.
Be some window if the only business we do is selling pritch to Mowbray mind
Why would TM be after Pritch and why would he go there TM rarely played him?
I mean I don't want to mention the conspiracy but .....
I mean I don't want to mention the conspiracy but .....
I asked the same elsewhere and it was suggested Pritchard is only playing as Roberts is injured and it would usually be a midfield of Neil, Ekwah, Jobe, Clarke and Roberts
this is what I thought but he’s also played when Ba was in instead of Rusyn
Hibs after jewi on loan, would be a good move for him
Unless we replace him with Amad. With what’s going on currently at utd I think it’s possible they bring players in and he becomes free.
I don’t think their takeover will complete in time for that. More likely in the summer IMO. But by then the ship may have sailed.
I think we all think that Pritch should be ahead of Jobe as link man and Jobe competes for a cm. Equally we all cried out for more height and physicality last year so we miss that without Jobe who does work hard and press. My issue with Jobe is he takes 3 touches and runs when the ball could move quicker. Effectively slowing us down
Is that not the elephant in the room though? Jobe is playing no matter what
It's starting to feel more and more like something is in place that Jobe has to start. So he plays up front at the cost of a striker (don't care what Jude or anyone else says he isn't going to be a striker if he forgets he is up front and drops back into midfield for 80% of the match!) or players that we would want to play instead of him end up out of position (Pritch on the right, at least I think that's who was supposed to be there end it ended up being not ****er!).
Well Berrada is moving across from city it seems so things are starting to shift at speed
I think showing the lad he isn't guaranteed a start could help hos development anyway. Make him improve and fight for it!
He deserved his spot early.on in the season, now not so much! And if there is something in place where he plays if fit, whoever put it in place (Jobes team or the club) need to take a long hard look at the future! This could effect his development, being in crap form could put off teams willing to pay big money all in all it would be better for everyone if he was dropped to bench and had to earn his way in. Up until recently it would have taken much to take Ekwahs spot as he looked poor after injury but looked to be on the up recently!
Of course and Beale is getting some of the **** for this, as was Mowbray. He isn’t **** Jobe and people are implying that. He’s a good signing and I think experience will make him stronger. But it’s ok for an 18 year old to drop in and out of the side.
I might get pelters for this because I genuinely believe we’ve agreed to start Jobe most games. And I think they think he will be an 8 but isn’t good enough yet so they’re playing him as a 10 as it’s a position he can’t cause damage in. The problem is it completely hampers us.
It’s actually not fair on the lad. He may very well end up becoming a scapegoat and drawing ire from supporters, even more than he is now.
He’s going to be a great player. But he’s only going to be a great player if he gets experience playing in the right position in a team playing well. Playing him out of position, in a team playing poorly, will likely see him still playing championship football in 5 years
proof will be in pudding next season to see how much game time Rigg gets (assuming Rigg chooses to stay, he doesn’t have to). We are getting told patience is necessary for Riggs development (I agree). But no such patience is being shown Jobe. Which is one of several reasons I’m convinced he’s being pushed to start by his Dad.
It’s actually not fair on the lad. He may very well end up becoming a scapegoat and drawing ire from supporters, even more than he is now.
He’s going to be a great player. But he’s only going to be a great player if he gets experience playing in the right position in a team playing well. Playing him out of position, in a team playing poorly, will likely see him still playing championship football in 5 years
proof will be in pudding next season to see how much game time Rigg gets (assuming Rigg chooses to stay, he doesn’t have to). We are getting told patience is necessary for Riggs development (I agree). But no such patience is being shown Jobe. Which is one of several reasons I’m convinced he’s being pushed to start by his Dad.
We are running him into the ground, he can't be expected to play every game at his age
I’m also convinced Ekwah and Jobe would both be better players in 6 months if they each played 45 mins of each game rather than 90.
(obviously I don’t mean prearranged half time subs, I just mean an even split)
(obviously I don’t mean prearranged half time subs, I just mean an even split)
It would. Playing every week in the SPL would toughen him up.
Just a thought on Jobe and these rumours of having to play clauses.
Doesn't that set an incredibly dangerous precedent if we have agreed to it? What's to stop Rigg asking for the same?
Surely we wouldn't agree to it? Playing full time no matter what form your in can't be good for any players development
Doesn't that set an incredibly dangerous precedent if we have agreed to it? What's to stop Rigg asking for the same?
Surely we wouldn't agree to it? Playing full time no matter what form your in can't be good for any players development