Everton and Forest have been charged by the Premier League for breaking financial rules.
Sean Dyche will expect them to go on a run, now.
Sean Dyche will expect them to go on a run, now.
it wasn't thought of working class game it just was .Hence pretty much every ground years ago was ringed by terraced housing or similar so supporters could walk to the ground .It was never a good thing that it was thought of as a working man's game. Sport and culture should be open to all, not restricted by class, sex or anything else. It's the bread and circuses model of society in disguise.
We were the better team and had more of everything.Man U's manager says they were unlucky.Spurs manager says they were unlucky.Who was right? Thanks to Peacock I couldn't get the match.
They don't fit into an English class system. The game has changed post PL.
Everton and Forest have been charged by the Premier League for breaking financial rules.
Sean Dyche will expect them to go on a run, now.
You break one rule once, the Premier League come down on you like a ton of room temperature lardEverton and Forest have been charged by the Premier League for breaking financial rules.
Sean Dyche will expect them to go on a run, now.
It didn't start as a working class game though....the first nine FA Cup finals were contested entirely by ex public school boys or officers in the forces.it wasn't thought of working class game it just was .Hence pretty much every ground years ago was ringed by terraced housing or similar so supporters could walk to the ground .
That is not beginning of football at all. It is a game of the people banned by 6 Kings despite which the people ignored it and played on.It didn't start as a working class game though....the first nine FA Cup finals were contested entirely by ex public school boys or officers in the forces.
My point is that it wasn't a good thing that it came to be owned by working class men. And the fact that the poorest in society can no longer go to matches is a very bad thing but one of the least of their worries in practice. Football is one of the most enjoyable sports in the world and it was inevitable that it would become money dominated.
I'm not altering history...football rules were codified at Cambridge University because it had already become a game played by public schools long before the FA was set up. Football clubs were always owned by the rich and they encouraged working class people to play to stop them wasting their time when Saturday afternoon work in factories was legislated against. Seeing the game as belonging to the working class is falling into a trap set by the ruling class....giving the poor something interesting to do is much cheaper than treating them properly.That is not beginning of football at all. It is a game of the people banned by 6 Kings despite which the people ignored it and played on.
You are talking about the time when the middle classes tried to tame it and set up the FA rules. I don't know why you are trying to change history, but of course that's what the middle classes do I suppose. RUGBY is the middle class game because they could afford grass. The people had to play on hard surfaces and that's why they banned handling the ball and tackling the man.
Seeing the game as belonging to the working class is falling into a trap set by the ruling class....giving the poor something interesting to do is much cheaper than treating them properly..
The game had been played by the people long before that, hundreds of years in fact. The public schools had grass as I said so yes they played it but the FA codified it they did not invent it. The game was initially played between villages and estate workers without rules. Simply the 'ball' had to be taken to the 'goal' which was the opposing village. People died and property was damaged which is why successive Kings called for bans. ITS THE PEOPLES GAMEI'm not altering history...football rules were codified at Cambridge University because it had already become a game played by public schools long before the FA was set up. Football clubs were always owned by the rich and they encouraged working class people to play to stop them wasting their time when Saturday afternoon work in factories was legislated against. Seeing the game as belonging to the working class is falling into a trap set by the ruling class....giving the poor something interesting to do is much cheaper than treating them properly.
And I am definitely from a working class background. Both my parents left school at 14....my mum never worked after she had children and my dad was a labourer when he came over from Ireland and had risen to the dizzy heights of a charge hand in a warehouse when he retired.

Apologies for thinking you were middle class. You are clearly a rich yobI'm not altering history...football rules were codified at Cambridge University because it had already become a game played by public schools long before the FA was set up. Football clubs were always owned by the rich and they encouraged working class people to play to stop them wasting their time when Saturday afternoon work in factories was legislated against. Seeing the game as belonging to the working class is falling into a trap set by the ruling class....giving the poor something interesting to do is much cheaper than treating them properly.
And I am definitely from a working class background. Both my parents left school at 14....my mum never worked after she had children and my dad was a labourer when he came over from Ireland and had risen to the dizzy heights of a charge hand in a warehouse when he retired.

You are making my point for me. The game was deliberately sanitised as the industrial revolution kicked in to become a state tool of worker control. The workers were only allowed to play it and watch it if they they followed the ruling classes rules.The game had been played by the people long before that, hundreds of years in fact. The public schools had grass as I said so yes they played it but the FA codified it they did not invent it. The game was initially played between villages and estate workers without rules. Simply the 'ball' had to be taken to the 'goal' which was the opposing village. People died and property was damaged which is why successive Kings called for bans. ITS THE PEOPLES GAME![]()
That's how the whole system works and we agree but I was not having that discussion. The point is that it is the working peoples game, the sanitation is obvious and has changed from English toffs to anyone with enough money, toff or not. I have no nostalgia except for individual players and a few teams. The game is still to beat the system as much as the opponent hence VAR and players trying to get around the rules.You are making my point for me. The game was deliberately sanitised as the industrial revolution kicked in to become a state tool of worker control. The workers were only allowed to play it and watch it if they they followed the ruling classes rules.
To have a nostalgia for how things were after that is exactly what Orwell was warning about.
Apologies for thinking you were middle class. You are clearly a rich yob![]()
I am using English terms.There are only working and non-working class "social" groupings.
Every other designation is (grievance) 'group identity politics' .