We would still be weak in midfield thats why I suggest a 3/5/2 or 4/3/2/1 depending on opposition it will give us a more solid defensive base, and more options personnel wise while still retaining some shape. We are far too vulnerable atm to counters as we have seen, so we need to bring Seelt into our line up in his natural position, without loosing O/9's massive pitch wide contribution, he is in my mind the best all round player at the club and should be first name on the team sheet. I also think we are asking far too much of Dan Neil an even more exciting player as the attacking mid field player he was alongside Evans..
On Clarke he may look selfish to some, but his main threat is when he turns back towards his own goal dragging defenders out of position, he then makes a turn one way or another wrong footing the defenders, only Pritchard reads this and that is why they are so dangerous together once we have his full back overlapping ( with O/9 covering the run ), he can use three options not just the one. For me we have asked far too much of Clarke recently with so little coming down the other wing and that is why I think he could do with some help if not rest . He is as we tend to forget still a very young footballer, and far too valuable an asset to see burnt out because of poor team strategy.