The seven clubs that blocked ban on signing loan players from partner teams were (according to sources) Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves, Forest."
What sources?
The seven clubs that blocked ban on signing loan players from partner teams were (according to sources) Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves, Forest."
And they were quite right to do so.The seven clubs that blocked ban on signing loan players from partner teams were (according to sources) Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves, Forest."
Seeing as Everton are going to be part of 777 that own all or or shares in a number of European and South American clubs I would suggest that Twitter is t the place to research.The seven clubs that blocked ban on signing loan players from partner teams were (according to sources) Newcastle, Sheff Utd, Man City, Chelsea, Everton, Wolves, Forest."
Yeah I am not arsed eitherAnd they were quite right to do so.
cryarsing about teams loaning players when it's gone on for years. Ahh but they will get the better players or get players cheaper because of the link. Who cares.
And they were quite right to do so.
cryarsing about teams loaning players when it's gone on for years. Ahh but they will get the better players or get players cheaper because of the link. Who cares.
Off the top of my head I think Watford loaned a bunch of players from an Italian club they were linked with and Man City loaned Lampard from New York (there's probably others). The Red Bulls clubs, along with others, run it almost as an art form in Europe.
That was 2012 from Udinese, when we were in the Championship and the Pozzos saved us from going bust after the previous owner had mislaid all the money we had earned the previous season
We did not realise at the time that we had destroyed the Premier League by doing that but I am pleased the Premier League survived as did we, the English League then wanted to stop that from ever happening again and so the amount of players loans from one club was reduced
Watford and Udinese have had separate owners since the original take over but that does not seem to matter any more going by the changes being allowed in the Prem now
That £15m they gave you for a dross left-back a few years ago was handy though.
We paid £1m for Pedro and sold him to Brighton for £36m, £2m for Richarlison and sold him to Everton for £40m that is what you call useful
Yeah but I was talking about the bung Udinese gave you for a mediocre Championship full-back.
The full back that was player of the season and had Salah in his back pocket when we played Liverpool at Anfield
Your bitterness knows no bounds
So good they loaned him straight back to you after the bung.
Ohh you mean like Man U buying Zara from Palace and loaning him straight back
The Top flight have been doing it for decades
Zaha was 21 and going to United whereas Kamara was late 20s going to a mid-table Italian club and Palace and United aren’t owned by the same people so not really.