Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It doesn't matter what the actual number is...it's quite clear that the number of incorrect decisions is high enough to affect the final order of a league table AND that VAR reduces errors dramatically.
If I was on the IFAB my objective would be to write and enforce the rules in such a way that cheating is eliminated by making the consequences of cheating worse than the gains. A great example is the disallowed Sterling goal on Monday. He knew he had handled it but without VAR the goal would have stood because no onfield official saw it. What would happen in a proper sport is that he would have told the ref it had hit his hand and you wouldn't need VAR.
I think I want the same outcome as you but think VAR is a tool to achieve it because it makes it more certain that cheats don't prosper.
I would be shocked if you and I didn't want the same outcome, in terms of football the game. We disagree on the way to get there and the direction of travel. Like Ange said I am just an older fan shouting into the wind because I think we are in grave danger of losing football as the spectacle it's been for a very long time. The game has always changed from it's beginnings when it was just two villages fighting one another without rules. People died and villages were trashed. 6 Kings of England banned the game but the people carried on regardless. Then in 1863 the FA began and the rules were formalised. I'm sure you know all this, so forgive me for repeating the history but it is important for the context of my argument. I am pretty sure that in recent years since SKY there has been more meddling with the rules than ever before. We have reached the stage where every season there is a discussion by the powers on how the rules should be enforced and interpreted. This is a nightmare for referees and they get the stick when things go wrong. Now we have reached the stage where pro footballers often do not know the rules they are playing under. Is it hand ball is it not hand ball. Defenders having to put their hands behind their back. Is it a red card is it not a red card. It used to be simple, was the player playing dangerously or not.
If these changes were working we would have less penalties, less red cards, and less cheating. We have the opposite which suggests to me that all the messing about with the rule book is counter productive.
Despite what the pundits say I do not think our last game with Chelsea was a great game I think it was a travesty of football. Where the referee and VAR becomes more important than the game. Where the interruptions to play were so frequent that you wonder if four of our player ending up with injuries was a direct consequence of standing around getting cold. I applaud our manager for what he said about VAR and referees, he is spot on IMO.
 
The laws of the game have been changed and changed again and each time we get further from the spirit of football and what made it so popular in the first place. For example Off Side: was never meant to be judged to the millimetre. It was created to stop players taking advantage by moving behind a defence. There used to be a simple arrangement to give the benefit of any doubt to the forward, simply because most people want to see attacking football and goals. We now have the emphasis almost on preventing goals. Football is not snooker or cricket it is a contact sport where EVERY tackle is a potential foul you therefore need a referee to make 'common sense' decisions instead we are getting decisions as if football is an exact science.
VAR actually forces the onfield officials to give the benefit of the doubt to the forward as the decision can be properly checked later.
 
VAR actually forces the onfield officials to give the benefit of the doubt to the forward as the decision can be properly checked later.
Benefit of the doubt and no check later. Although as I have said Offside is an area where you can make sure even if it is against the spirit of the game.
 
I would be shocked if you and I didn't want the same outcome, in terms of football the game. We disagree on the way to get there and the direction of travel. Like Ange said I am just an older fan shouting into the wind because I think we are in grave danger of losing football as the spectacle it's been for a very long time. The game has always changed from it's beginnings when it was just two villages fighting one another without rules. People died and villages were trashed. 6 Kings of England banned the game but the people carried on regardless. Then in 1863 the FA began and the rules were formalised. I'm sure you know all this, so forgive me for repeating the history but it is important for the context of my argument. I am pretty sure that in recent years since SKY there have been more meddling with the rules than ever before. We have reached the stage where every season there is a discussion by the powers on how the rules should be enforced and interpreted. This is a nightmare for referees and they get the stick when things go wrong. Now we have reached the stage where pro footballers often do not know the rules they are playing under. Is it hand ball is it not hand ball. Defenders having to put their hands behind their back. Is it a red card is it not a red card. It used to be simple, was the player playing dangerously or not.
If these changes were working we would have less penalties, less red cards, and less cheating. We have the opposite which suggests to me that all the messing about with the rule book is counter productive.
Despite what the pundits say I do not think our last game with Chelsea was a great game I think it was a travesty of football. Where the referee and VAR becomes more important than the game. Where the interruptions to play were so frequent that you wonder if four of our player ending up with injuries was a direct consequence of standing around getting cold. I applaud our manager for what he said about VAR and referees, he is spot on IMO.
It wasn’t a great game because 20 minutes was spent watching the players stand around waiting for VAR to make decisions. This is not the kind of drama you want in football. But it is increasingly becoming the focal point of the game and the main talking points afterwards. And it often takes the momentum out of the game. We rarely see teams get up a head of steam chasing a goal, forcing a succession of corners etc. VAR intervenes and by the time the game restarts after 5 minutes, the team under pressure had had to time to rest and regroup and the impetus is lost.
Other sports are finding that the increased use of technology is spoiling the spectacle too. It’s becoming tedious in cricket and rugby.
 
I would be shocked if you and I didn't want the same outcome, in terms of football the game. We disagree on the way to get there and the direction of travel. Like Ange said I am just an older fan shouting into the wind because I think we are in grave danger of losing football as the spectacle it's been for a very long time. The game has always changed from it's beginnings when it was just two villages fighting one another without rules. People died and villages were trashed. 6 Kings of England banned the game but the people carried on regardless. Then in 1863 the FA began and the rules were formalised. I'm sure you know all this, so forgive me for repeating the history but it is important for the context of my argument. I am pretty sure that in recent years since SKY there has been more meddling with the rules than ever before. We have reached the stage where every season there is a discussion by the powers on how the rules should be enforced and interpreted. This is a nightmare for referees and they get the stick when things go wrong. Now we have reached the stage where pro footballers often do not know the rules they are playing under. Is it hand ball is it not hand ball. Defenders having to put their hands behind their back. Is it a red card is it not a red card. It used to be simple, was the player playing dangerously or not.
If these changes were working we would have less penalties, less red cards, and less cheating. We have the opposite which suggests to me that all the messing about with the rule book is counter productive.
Despite what the pundits say I do not think our last game with Chelsea was a great game I think it was a travesty of football. Where the referee and VAR becomes more important than the game. Where the interruptions to play were so frequent that you wonder if four of our player ending up with injuries was a direct consequence of standing around getting cold. I applaud our manager for what he said about VAR and referees, he is spot on IMO.
I can't find definitive data....where did you find red cards and penalties going up?
I think the issue with IFAB is that they fiddle with the rules rather than addressing the major problems with them. And the biggest problem of all is the principle behind them which should be to discourage cheating rather than punishing it.
As an example... shirt pulling can't be done accidentally so is always a deliberate foul. It could be completely eliminated by making the punishment very harsh. The same for delaying the taking of free kicks and penalties. And for fouls to prevent breaks.
What isn't needed is harsh punishment for mistimed tackles where there is a genuine attempt to play the ball and no danger to the opponent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Changing Man
It wasn’t a great game because 20 minutes was spent watching the players stand around waiting for VAR to make decisions. This is not the kind of drama you want in football. But it is increasingly becoming the focal point of the game and the main talking points afterwards. And it often takes the momentum out of the game. We rarely see teams get up a head of steam chasing a goal, forcing a succession of corners etc. VAR intervenes and by the time the game restarts after 5 minutes, the team under pressure had had to time to rest and regroup and the impetus is lost.
Other sports are finding that the increased use of technology is spoiling the spectacle too. It’s becoming tedious in cricket and rugby.
Hard cases make bad laws. It's unusual for a game to have 10 goals with five disallowed on close decisions and three more also close, as well as an obvious penalty and four possible red card offences of which three were completely missed on the field. That's thirteen VAR interventions which surely must be a record.
 
I can't find definitive data....where did you find red cards and penalties going up?
I think the issue with IFAB is that they fiddle with the rules rather than addressing the major problems with them. And the biggest problem of all is the principle behind them which should be to discourage cheating rather than punishing it.
As an example... shirt pulling can't be done accidentally so is always a deliberate foul. It could be completely eliminated by making the punishment very harsh. The same for delaying the taking of free kicks and penalties. And for fouls to prevent breaks.
What isn't needed is harsh punishment for mistimed tackles where there is a genuine attempt to play the ball and no danger to the opponent.
Red Cards and Penalties are simply common place when they were rare before. You don't need to find stats. it's obvious.
I agree about shirt pulling. We saw what happened (Again the Chelsea game) when Oliver let the game 'flow'. The intensity rose and the red cards happened. We could all tell you that any game between Spurs & Chelsea will be heated. The ref needs to cool it not add petrol to the flames. As far as I am concerned Oliver created the conditions that caused the red cards. I am not removing the blame from the two players but I am also not going to complain because they are full of passion and trying to win. The ref is there to stop fights, that's why we needed them in the first place.
 
We saw what happened (Again the Chelsea game) when Oliver let the game 'flow'. The intensity rose and the red cards happened. We could all tell you that any game between Spurs & Chelsea will be heated. The ref needs to cool it not add petrol to the flames. As far as I am concerned Oliver created the conditions that caused the red cards.
It was reminiscent of the so-called Battle of the Bridge.
Clattenburg deliberately didn't do his job, by his own admission.
Oliver takes a similar attitude to virtually every game.

We started both well, took the lead and were coasting.
They clogged away, didn't get pulled for anything and then came chaos.
Then the post-match analysis is about Spurs losing it.
 
It was reminiscent of the so-called Battle of the Bridge.
Clattenburg deliberately didn't do his job, by his own admission.
Oliver takes a similar attitude to virtually every game.

We started both well, took the lead and were coasting.
They clogged away, didn't get pulled for anything and then came chaos.
Then the post-match analysis is about Spurs losing it.

The Clattenburg debacle started because very
early on in the game, nasty Chelsky tackles were
going in and then unpunished.

As I have stated this season, I have noted that
in the first 15-20 mins of Spurs games, the
opposition are committing a lot of fouls before
Spurs even commit one. This is :

- good, in that it indicates that the opposition
defence is struggling to deal with the Spurs attack

- bad, in that it signals to the perps that there
is much more they can get away with, and to
the aggrieved that the ref is against you
(which leads players with lesser calm to attempt
to "even the score" ) .

I have long advocated the "team fouls" concept
in basketball, where when the collective total
hits a point, each subsequent foul is immediately
punished. In football the equivalent could be
every Nth foul by a team, no matter who commits
it nor how minor, results in a yellow card.
 
The Clattenburg debacle started because very
early on in the game, nasty Chelsky tackles were
going in and then unpunished.

As I have stated this season, I have noted that
in the first 15-20 mins of Spurs games, the
opposition are committing a lot of fouls before
Spurs even commit one. This is :

- good, in that it indicates that the opposition
defence is struggling to deal with the Spurs attack

- bad, in that it signals to the perps that there
is much more they can get away with, and to
the aggrieved that the ref is against you
(which leads players with lesser calm to attempt
to "even the score" ) .

I have long advocated the "team fouls" concept
in basketball, where when the collective total
hits a point, each subsequent foul is immediately
punished. In football the equivalent could be
every Nth foul by a team, no matter who commits
it nor how minor, results in a yellow card.
My namesake, Graham Poll, referred to it as "machine gunning" in a dark arts article in 2011.
It was for the Daily Fail, because he's a massive twat.
They're well aware of what's happening, they just don't want to deal with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humanbeingincroydon
My namesake, Graham Poll, referred to it as "machine gunning" in a dark arts article in 2011.
It was for the Daily Fail, because he's a massive twat.
They're well aware of what's happening, they just don't want to deal with it.

Then managers should be talking in public,

I recall there was a period a while back when
somebody shamed the refs over Cirehs'
breakaway-preventing MF fouls spread among
the team (and therefore nobody was getting carded) .
Not long after, Citeh did it early on in a
game and the ref gave a yellow card (much to
the anger of the false messiah :) ) .

The beauty of my proposal is you would have
statistical precision on fairness (the foul profile
of any game in the season for a club in Mth
place vs a club in Nth place would be known) .
 
You must log in or register to see images


Ferguson with the next, clearly unimpressed, Man Utd manager? <whistle>
 
Currently 4-3 to city... very entertaining game...Chelsea looking decent and unlucky to be losing...3 mins plus added left