Off Topic Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Glad I don't support Yorkshire. Being hauled up in front of MPs because of working conditions in his company, drinking pints with his top off etc. Wouldn't want him anywhere near my club personally.
Yeah i get that. But from a “business” perspective, he runs things pretty well. Just my opinion though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oliver's Army
Yeah i get that. But from a “business” perspective, he runs things pretty well. Just my opinion though
I'd just be a bit embarrassed having him associated with my club because of his past antics that's all. He had the scum in the black financially so he knows what he's doing from that perspective, I just don't like the fella.

Wonder if he plasters sports direct all over their ground
 
Got be interesting to hear the truth about this WC campaign when one of them brings out a book post-retirement
My money is on David Willey.............
 
  • Like
Reactions: Durham Ranger
Not watching, what does that even mean?
He has 2 mins from the fall of the wicket to be ready to face his 1st ball. He got to the wicket in time, then realised the chin strap on his helmet was broken - meaning he wasn't ready.
Bangladesh appealed, the umpires asked them twice if they were sure they wanted to appeal, they confirmed they were so they had to give him out
 
He has 2 mins from the fall of the wicket to be ready to face his 1st ball. He got to the wicket in time, then realised the chin strap on his helmet was broken - meaning he wasn't ready.
Bangladesh appealed, the umpires asked them twice if they were sure they wanted to appeal, they confirmed they were so they had to give him out
Apparently he took too long to get sorted before the chin strap broke. Only about 5 players been timed out since the rule was introduced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wayne the Punk
Apparently he took too long to get sorted before the chin strap broke. Only about 5 players been timed out since the rule was introduced.
I hate wickets given on a technicality - regardless of the format, wickets should be earned through skill and endeavour - mankads, obstructing the field, The Bairstow run out.............it's all bull ****
 
He has 2 mins from the fall of the wicket to be ready to face his 1st ball. He got to the wicket in time, then realised the chin strap on his helmet was broken - meaning he wasn't ready.
Bangladesh appealed, the umpires asked them twice if they were sure they wanted to appeal, they confirmed they were so they had to give him out

I didnt know about that rule
Bit ****ty from Bangladesh

Thank you
 
I hate wickets given on a technicality - regardless of the format, wickets should be earned through skill and endeavour - mankads, obstructing the field, The Bairstow run out.............it's all bull ****
Agreed.although the Mankads I get, but you give the batsman a warning first
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson
Not watching, what does that even mean?
In the current rules you are allowed 2 minutes as the new batsman following a dismissal to be ready to face a delivery. This batsman was in good time until he took his helmet off again saying his strap was not right. This took it past the two minutes and Bangladesh appealed for the wicket. Apparently the umpire had no option but to give it as straps should be checked in advance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wayne the Punk