Coronavirus

Sahara dust isn’t Sahara dust……..

https://x.com/nullen80/status/1699873461340934531?s=46&t=GjXW4PhG0s7kgSMl8GkTkw

 

Summer wildfires were all arson.

it’s hot in summer yeah, people like to start fires.
Flood, it’s September and someone likes to redirect rivers yeah. Nothing to do with climate change

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66716501

Is this the end of YouTube grifter Nurse Campbell?

As he isnt a Dr or practicing medical professional….

 

Dr John Campbell lives in your head ……fella not even named in article but your head

anyways I’m not sure your crowd will survive the cull of opinions

quote….The BBC has approached Meta and TikTok to ask if they plan to bring similar verification to their platforms.

 

Lol

 

Can’t be too careful with that deadly Covid about

 

Tell me you are a grifter, without telling me.



Bloke is a foot Dr and forgets about the vaccines that have saved millions.
polio, rubella, smallpox,measles, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis, whooping cough etc etc.. Yeah, you destroy them all.

 

It would sort out the population/resources problem.

 

makes you think why they even bothered with vaccines. The. Developed the covid on to kill us all off.

 

no money in that dude……getting rid of the weak though that’s a saving

 

Let me remind you of the Nuremberg code and why it was so important it was recognised worldwide…it disgusts me some on here wanted to take away a sovereign right of choice

shame on you guys for pissing in the graves of them that gave thy lives for that day we would need protection from these ideologies of the eugenics Nazis

 

THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be
so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
["Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

 

Have a good weekend peej……hopefully your watch won’t stop

 

After all them years of holding it in…thankfully she finally found her strength to bring this filth to justice only for the Covid jab to take away her ability to see him jailed for his crime……sad and local for me and luv

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/sex-assault-victim-died-covid-27682049

 

Will get back to you in November, when this hasn't happened

 

Depends if you survive the booster jab

 

Fking grifters ……..safe and effective

 

Winter is coming ……you can get flu jab Covid jab and shingles jab ……exciting times peej