Transfer Rumours Summer transfers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is this a good thread?

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Bodinki said:
There is still a month of the window left.
Plenty of time to sign a new striker.
You may have to write off the first couple of games though
Click to expand...

Spurs have a tricky start too. This could be another 2008 scenario when the club had 2 points from 8 games
 
brb said:
But the Spurs fans love him, why would he do that.....ok, ok, I know, let's move on.
Click to expand...
Maybe he wants revenge on Levy for putting the brakes on his move to City a couple seasons back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
FadgewackeR said:
Yeah, the choice of going where he wants is the big pull, but that would surely sour his era at Spurs, if he walks to a rival (lol) for nothing.

Also, string a major European club along for so long then slam the door in their face won't exactly resonate well. He must have already discussed terms with Bayern and expressed an interest in leaving.

All that said, if the PL scoring record is everything to him, he'll wait it out and shaft Spurs.
Click to expand...

The only way he’d sour his relationship with us is if he went Arsenal or Chelsea at the end of his deal, which I don’t see him doing.

Any other club would be fair game really and I’d say all fans would respect it too.

I’d rather keep him for this year than pocket the £100m, ain’t my money and we don’t really need it either. Besides we’d only likely waste it on more Richarlison’s and Ndombele’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and Bodinki
Dier Hard said:
I’d rather keep him for this year than pocket the £100m, ain’t my money and we don’t really need it either. Besides we’d only likely waste it on more Richarlison’s and Ndombele’s.
Click to expand...
<laugh>
You have a point.....
Where else would he go in England though?
City wont have him now they have Haaland, so his options would be Man United, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea.
He almost 100% wouldnt go to Arsenal, and I dont see Klopp signing him for Liverpool, nor do I think they would meet his wage demands.
That leaves United or Chelsea.
 
Bodinki said:
<laugh>
You have a point.....
Where else would he go in England though?
City wont have him now they have Haaland, so his options would be Man United, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea.
He almost 100% wouldnt go to Arsenal, and I dont see Klopp signing him for Liverpool, nor do I think they would meet his wage demands.
That leaves United or Chelsea.
Click to expand...

This is based on the assumption he wouldn't go abroad after his deal ends though.

But if he did stay in England, knowing City and Pep, they'd probably take him on a free transfer. Pep likes a big squad with bags of quality and he'd probably find a formation to fit both anyway. Plus you never know, Haaland also may fancy a new challenge that summer himself, strikes me as the type of player who'll wanna score goals and win titles in multiple countries, sort of like a Zlatan.
 
New Tottenham manager Ange Postecoglou had promised to sell Kane his "vision" for the club following his appointment this summer, saying he wanted the striker to stay in north London.



You must log in or register to see images
 
Told ya’ll.


You must log in or register to see media
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Another two weeks of kane being greedy then he'll go leaving them no time to replace him hopefully.
 
PINKIE said:
That would be peak Spursy if that happens.

Keep him for another year to achieve **** all and miss out on £100m

<laugh>
Click to expand...
He’ll sign a new contract. I’d put money on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back