Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I said it, but we (the club) are too rigid and mono-thinking about our transfers.
It is: This player or nobody
And: We are trying to buy this player an nobody else at the moment

We never seem to be working on more than one deal at once, which means when they drag out we are left scrabbling for any others.
And I know Henderson and Fabinho weren't planned but you've got to be ready to adapt and change to the new circumstances.
I agree with everything there, it doesn't matter that 2 players left unexpectedly they were no spring chickens anyway and we should have had one eye on replacing them. We're all in on a 19 year old with seemingly no back up plan.
 
I think that the stuff about our wage bill being high is a bit misleading. It's high when we are successful because its it has a really high performance based element and when we're not, its low. I bet you last season's wage bill will not be £150m more than Arsenals.
 
The asset it only worth anything when you sell it (if you have a buyer for that price). FSG have made nothing yet and i have no idea if they have put more in for purchases.
Well, no. They've sold minority stakes in both LFC and the holding company. I am willing to bet they've made back what they paid for club in investment already and probably much more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saintanton
Yep spot on and had this discussion loads
I do think FSG have made us sustainable

and what we had before them ….
They did get lucky with Klopp or it was good management selection - we won’t know till he leaves - which i too worry about

Klopp and Pep are two totally different managers and the argument of - well klopp spent big on Ali and VVd really grates because everyone forgets or ignores he sold Couts to do it (tbh for me that was the lucky bit as I don’t think we would have bought both or even one of them had that sale not been made).

That’s why net spend comes from LFC fans because many of the other Prem teams and some champ seem to just buy whoever they want

pep May not have spent the record on a GL or Def or Mid or CF but for me that’s not where the difference is
The difference is him bringing on 50-60 mil proven players from the bench and the reserve squad - while most other clubs have a limit they don’t

it doesn’t bother me that much it just means they don’t have to be as patient as other teams with the player
Spend 85mil on a player and not working
No prob sell him for 50 but another for 60 and see if it works - goes down as being ruthless when in actual fact it’s just the ability to make a mistake in purchasing

we are a club that has to utilise our mistakes
I'd agree with all of that.
Pep may well be a great manager, but we'll never know because he's never had to work within a budget and get the best out of limited players.
This is one of the reasons he has a whine now and again, like the one about added time. He knows he has every advantage it's possible to have so he has to manufacture difficulties to make it look like he triumphs over adversity.
Like I said a while back, give him a mid-table club on a limited budget, then let's see if he's really that good.
 
Still no worried so much on this, the side has no shape. That is far more worrying.

I've gone from thing 4th and europa would be OK for that first team to just hoping anfield drags us through europa to the final.
 
I think that the stuff about our wage bill being high is a bit misleading. It's high when we are successful because its it has a really high performance based element and when we're not, its low. I bet you last season's wage bill will not be £150m more than Arsenals.

£150m a year is mental. That’s 3m a week more. Given our total playing wage bill is around 2.5m a week mark I also find it massively hard to believe.

The only explanation for it is either as you say massive performance related stuff.. or what has happened in the past is that we actually pay all our wages of the back office staff and it includes all that where as a lot of other clubs pay them via a 3rd party or as contractors and it’s not included.
 
Lavia left out of cup game and not at training today as player's side looking to close the deal @sachatovelieri
 
Last edited:
Really does it matter what Southampton got?

They are in their rights to negotiate hard.

They are also living on parachute payments and as such know what they need to do on and off the field.

Lava clearly is for sale, same as when coutniho or 50 other of our players mysteriously vanish around the end of Windows etc.

It's only a question of who pays for him
 
£150m a year is mental. That’s 3m a week more. Given our total playing wage bill is around 2.5m a week mark I also find it massively hard to believe.

The only explanation for it is either as you say massive performance related stuff.. or what has happened in the past is that we actually pay all our wages of the back office staff and it includes all that where as a lot of other clubs pay them via a 3rd party or as contractors and it’s not included.

Our total wage bill including all staff is 300 odd million. You have hit the nail on the head, there is a lot of dodgy dealings round stadiums etc.
 
£150m a year is mental. That’s 3m a week more. Given our total playing wage bill is around 2.5m a week mark I also find it massively hard to believe.

The only explanation for it is either as you say massive performance related stuff.. or what has happened in the past is that we actually pay all our wages of the back office staff and it includes all that where as a lot of other clubs pay them via a 3rd party or as contractors and it’s not included.

I'm sure I read we shifted over £1m a week off our wage bill this summer with Milner, Ox, Keta, Bobby, Fab, and Hendo gone. I think somebody pointed out that it's @ £850k less when you factor in the wages of Mac and Slob. I assume Lavia will be £100k+ despite his age too, but nonetheless, we're not that bad when you do a wages-to-earning ratio. We still have lots of wiggle room when it comes to FFP, though as Klopp has pointed out, we simply don't have the finances to be able to pay the like of Mbappe £2m-£3m a week, even with ridiculous shirt sales that would follow.
 
Klopp's been successful at all the clubs he's been at but it took time to build and implement ideas before getting there. He's never successfully built a second team at the same club but maybe that's down to increased expectations (inevitable) that didn't suit his need for time to build (the bit on bold).

In time, he'll come good again but it seems the fans have become entitled after a few good seasons and they've forgotten what the club was like before Klopp arrived <confused>
 
Klopp's been successful at all the clubs he's been at but it took time to build and implement ideas before getting there. He's never successfully built a second team at the same club but maybe that's down to increased expectations (inevitable) that didn't suit his need for time to build (the bit on bold).

In time, he'll come good again but it seems the fans have become entitled after a few good seasons and they've forgotten what the club was like before Klopp arrived <confused>

I'm not sure anyone is questioning Klopp (bar Diego), he has to be backed in order to succeed - dragging Lavia out for weeks and weeks is a great example of him having to start on the back foot.
 
Klopp's been successful at all the clubs he's been at but it took time to build and implement ideas before getting there. He's never successfully built a second team at the same club but maybe that's down to increased expectations (inevitable) that didn't suit his need for time to build (the bit on bold).

In time, he'll come good again but it seems the fans have become entitled after a few good seasons and they've forgotten what the club was like before Klopp arrived <confused>

Fair enough, but we were one slip away from winning the title in 2014, albeit we came from nowhere on the back of a 13-game 100% run to catch, overhaul, then fall back again against City, and done almost entirely on the back of one of the greatest players ever to play in the Prem (the disloyal little ****). I'd have been fascinated to see how Rogers would have done if he'd got somebody of similar stature to Suarez after he went rather than having Balotteli foisted on to him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zanjinho
I'm not sure anyone is questioning Klopp (bar Diego), he has to be backed in order to succeed - dragging Lavia out for weeks and weeks is a great example of him having to start on the back foot.

Not sure klopp is totally blameless in that though? He’s had a lot more say in transfer stuff and although isn’t doing the negotiating, I’m sure if he said look he is a must have. Go buy him for 50m they’d have got the deal done.

It just amazes me how it takes a week between each bid being made. If saints are rejecting it almost instantly why does it take us a week to come back to them with a new offer of a couple million more.

We’d be useless at an auction where have to make decisions quickly.