Some people judge someone’s ability to present a TV programme (as we spell it in England) based on their knowledge and experience of the subject and ability to communicate well.
Why do women have to be sexual objects? They are otherwise just as qualified as the two people they’re replacing.
Well they aren’t dressed like some sections of society think women should be, covered head to toe. How naive to think their looks didn’t play a part in this.As for them being as knowledgeable as the people they have replaced what evidence do you have of that?
Saw a picture of the BBC presenting team for the women's world cup. Typically there was one token bloke taking a job from a more capable bird.
I thought this thread was to commemorate an achievement by your good self Balkan Tiger(Well done B.T)? Alas it appears not...