Transfer Rumours Summer transfers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is this a good thread?

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Spurlock said:
Not lucky at all ...they've been more than happy to be at Spurs

You're just brainwashed into thinking every decent player should leave a club

It's what you've been used to....looks like that might be changing though and you lads can heal your mental wounds over time
Click to expand...

We'll get there. When Shearer stayed with us despite us turning to muck I never really questioned it, now it's seemingly accepted players leave.

As regards Mbappe I stand by my response in the thread but will add that of course I'd have him (any club would) provided he takes a massive pay cut and doesn't rock the boat. It ain't happening.

It's not about just having the best players (Chelsea have better players than us), Ronaldo at 54 is clearly better than Almiron but I wouldn't swap them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FadgewackeR and Spurlock
Saff said:
Nope. Dont try change your words now.

You claimed Mbappe wasnt the sort of player you'd be interested in and we all knew what you meant.

You're a top chef but conference standard football discusser.
Click to expand...
You're a top knacker straw clutcher, I'll give you that. Next time, I'll be sure to include each and every detail of the profile build up of player in question, just so that straw clutchers and simpletons can be in no doubt.

In fact nah, I'll just continue to post in a way that most adults would be able to understand. If you'd continued to read through your own evidence re GG's "serious discussion" :rolleyes: you'd probably be able to understand my view on it. Probably.
 
haslam said:
We'll get there. When Shearer stayed with us despite us turning to muck I never really questioned it, now it's seemingly accepted players leave.

As regards Mbappe I stand by my response in the thread but will add that of course I'd have him (any club would) provided he takes a massive pay cut and doesn't rock the boat. It ain't happening.

It's not about just having the best players (Chelsea have better players than us), Ronaldo at 54 is clearly better than Almiron but I wouldn't swap them.
Click to expand...

Shearer snapped his ankle didn't he?

Then he came back to Dalglish being the manager, which from our point of view was a ****ing no brainer. Dalglish had won trophies throughout his career and was highly rated. Shearer agreed.

Then Ruud was in charge for a season, Shearer came close to leaving Newcastle, but (likely) convinced the board to sack Ruud. After that Robson was in charge and we had a good few years and great football.

I can see many chances for Shearer to leave that were prevented last minute.
 
FadgewackeR said:
You're a top knacker straw clutcher, I'll give you that. Next time, I'll be sure to include each and every detail of the profile build up of player in question, just so that straw clutchers and simpletons can be in no doubt.

In fact nah, I'll just continue to post in a way that most adults would be able to understand. If you'd continued to read through your own evidence re GG's "serious discussion" :rolleyes: you'd probably be able to understand my view on it. Probably.
Click to expand...

You never told me if you are in the UK or not

I asked you yesterday morning
 
FadgewackeR said:
Nope. That's not the way the club is being built up at all, however much others think. The profile, the wages, the circus. Not what we're doing at all.
Click to expand...

The Saudi’s want success and money is no object. Surely if there is a genuine chance of Mbappe (probably isn’t) then you’d take it as signing him would speed up the process (winning leagues and CL)
 
KingHotspur said:
The Saudi’s want success and money is no object. Surely if there is a genuine chance of Mbappe (probably isn’t) then you’d take it as signing him would speed up the process (winning leagues and CL)
Click to expand...

Money seems to certainly be an object. It's a myth from neutrals that Newcastle are spending outlandish amounts. Spending is industry standard so far.

I want us to spend more money like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haslam and FadgewackeR
KingHotspur said:
The Saudi’s want success and money is no object. Surely if there is a genuine chance of Mbappe (probably isn’t) then you’d take it as signing him would speed up the process (winning leagues and CL)
Click to expand...
As @Welshie says, money is an object. We just don't generate enough revenue to be able chuck all our eggs into one player like that, even if he could be convinced to come to Newcastle, which nobody is even trying to do.

We've got years of building up the revenue streams to be able to compete with the "big clubs" in terms of wages. If we had an opportunity to sign him now, and the club did it, unless he came for peanuts (comparatively) it would totally **** us for squad development plans.

That profile of player, no matter how good they are - the global superstar Messi, Ronaldo, Mbappe mould is not the type of player we're after now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KingHotspur
FosseFilberto said:
"He tried to mix it... and it didn’t end well..." <doh>,

Some people take this place, and themselves, way too seriously <laugh>

PS it ended perfectly for me ... one little dropped comment and a tirade of outrage and indignation ... even attracted the odd hanger on ... literally...<cheers>
Click to expand...

Made **** up to prove an incorrect point, was shown up for what it was, tried to claim it as a wind up.

Fairly standard stuff, sadly.

You should just accept when you are wrong or stfu (like Ern did), it's so much easier.

I wasn't in any way indignant/triggered/wound up, but there's no way I'm reading your drivel and allowing it to go posted as fact.

Unfortunately, you seem to see yourself as some sort of intellectual who can bluff his way round his own bullshit, but you're wrong on that as well.
 
FadgewackeR said:
As @Welshie says, money is an object. We just don't generate enough revenue to be able chuck all our eggs into one player like that, even if he could be convinced to come to Newcastle, which nobody is even trying to do.

We've got years of building up the revenue streams to be able to compete with the "big clubs" in terms of wages. If we had an opportunity to sign him now, and the club did it, unless he came for peanuts (comparatively) it would totally **** us for squad development plans.

That profile of player, no matter how good they are - the global superstar Messi, Ronaldo, Mbappe mould is not the type of player we're after now.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, I just assumed they’d do what City and Chelsea do and create income with sponsors or just completely ignore ffp
 
  • Like
Reactions: FadgewackeR
FadgewackeR said:
You're a top knacker straw clutcher, I'll give you that. Next time, I'll be sure to include each and every detail of the profile build up of player in question, just so that straw clutchers and simpletons can be in no doubt.

In fact nah, I'll just continue to post in a way that most adults would be able to understand. If you'd continued to read through your own evidence re GG's "serious discussion" :rolleyes: you'd probably be able to understand my view on it. Probably.
Click to expand...
Calm down ffs

Not my fault you've a racist and deluded fanbase. Which you evidently do have.
 
KingHotspur said:
Fair enough, I just assumed they’d do what City and Chelsea do and create income with sponsors or just completely ignore ffp
Click to expand...
They've just quadrupled their income on one sponsorship with a Saudi company.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JakartaToon
Welshie said:
I think Kane and Son are class personally. Spurs are lucky to have them and have so far wasted their potential.
Click to expand...

I like Son to that there is no doubt.

Kane for all his goals, has failed to see Spurs as a club win anything, so he gets thrown in the same basket as Stan Collymore and Matt Le Tiss, oh yeah and Steve Bull remember him. <laugh>

Now class is someone like the great Chelsea man who died today, a trophy haul that Kane can only dream about...

Player[edit]

Chelsea
Arsenal
  • European Cup Winners' Cup runner-up: 1979–80

I will not include John's title at Swansea as Kane still has them years to come.
 
brb said:
I like Son to that there is no doubt.

Kane for all his goals, has failed to see Spurs as a club win anything, so he gets thrown in the same basket as Stan Collymore and Matt Le Tiss, oh yeah and Steve Bull remember him. <laugh>

Now class is someone like the great Chelsea man who died today, a trophy haul that Kane can only dream about...

Player[edit]

Chelsea
Arsenal
  • European Cup Winners' Cup runner-up: 1979–80

I will not include John's title at Swansea as Kane still has them years to come.
Click to expand...

Actually forget Steve Bull, he won some minnow trophies, my doh.
 
Saff said:
Calm down ffs

Not my fault you've a racist and deluded fanbase. Which you evidently do have.
Click to expand...
I'm calm, but not because you told me to be, just because getting would up on forum by people who's sole aim is to be on the wind up isn't really where I'm at.

Work's done. Time for a racist and deluded refreshment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back