yorkshirehornet
Well-Known Member
You must log in or register to see media
The Russian consideration of human rights is abominable........
You must log in or register to see media
The Russian consideration of human rights is abominable........
I see that Musk is now limiting access to his starlink satellites .
Pole like him really should not have such power.
The use of drugs in warfare is pretty well established BB. All sides were using them in World War 2 - the Wehrmacht were using so called Panzerschokolade, which was, more or less, crystal meth and the US military were using massive amounts of amphetamines, as they were also in Vietnam. The list of drug use in warfare is endless and most wars are followed by a programme of dealing with the resultant addicts - I think you'll find that the Ukrainians are probably using them as well - but this won't be broadcast in the same way."Russian forces are plying "disposable" troops with drugs and launching them into suicidal missions against Ukrainian positions."
I find it increasingly difficult to know which side to believe, not to mention trust the media to report truthfully - but if this is true I really don't understand how anyone can be on Putin's side in this conflict, even his own people. Utterly despicable.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/disposable-russian-troops-using-drugs-ukraine/?s=03
Having a few friends in Australia who fought in Vietnam, sometimes alongside US troops, I was aware that the yanks were big drug users - but they were more 'recreational' and/or performance enhancing. Am pretty sure that the performance enhancing element applied to the Wehrmacht too, but will stand corrected.The use of drugs in warfare is pretty well established BB. All sides were using them in World War 2 - the Wehrmacht were using so called Panzerschokolade, which was, more or less, crystal meth and the US military were using massive amounts of amphetamines, as they were also in Vietnam. The list of drug use in warfare is endless and most wars are followed by a programme of dealing with the resultant addicts - I think you'll find that the Ukrainians are probably using them as well - but this won't be broadcast in the same way.
Seems to confirm what I said...
Scorched earth retreat, russians are famous for that, though unlike with Napoleon or Hitler, the emphasis and reasoning are different in that they're not intending to regroup and come back for the land anytime soon. I think they know that, barring a monumental cock-up, they are about to get their arses royally kicked. I think they will want to make it as financially expensive for Ukraine as possible to put their country back together again.It is being reported that with the destruction of Nova Kakhovka dam, no water supply for Crimea is possible for years. If as widely believed it was Russia that blew the dam, (it makes no sense to suggest that Ukraine would have done this) then one has to assume that retreat from Crimea is now part of the Putin master plan.
Like a jilted lover: If I can't have her, no-one can...Scorched earth retreat, russians are famous for that, though unlike with Napoleon or Hitler, the emphasis and reasoning are different in that they're not intending to regroup and come back for the land anytime soon. I think they know that, barring a monumental cock-up, they are about to get their arses royally kicked. I think they will want to make it as financially expensive for Ukraine as possible to put their country back together again.
Water is indeed a sensitive theme for Russian-Ukrainian relations Frenchie. Both countries blame each other for what happened, in both cases without providing any evidence. The north Crimean canal which flows from this provides 85% of Crimea's water supply and the canal now has less water than before the blast. The canal had previously been blocked by Ukraine, which led to acute shortages on the peninsula after 2014, shortages which only ended following Russia's seizing of the canal in February this year. Prior to this Putin had held frequent meetings on how to alleviate Crimea's water problems. At the moment there is no evidence on either side but Ukraine at least had the motives for this. Suggestion that this implies a scorched earth policy by Russia, indicating their imminent retreat come over as wishfull thinking and not much more than that.It is being reported that with the destruction of Nova Kakhovka dam, no water supply for Crimea is possible for years. If as widely believed it was Russia that blew the dam, (it makes no sense to suggest that Ukraine would have done this) then one has to assume that retreat from Crimea is now part of the Putin master plan.
Water is indeed a sensitive theme for Russian-Ukrainian relations Frenchie. Both countries blame each other for what happened, in both cases without providing any evidence. The north Crimean canal which flows from this provides 85% of Crimea's water supply and the canal now has less water than before the blast. The canal had previously been blocked by Ukraine, which led to acute shortages on the peninsula after 2014, shortages which only ended following Russia's seizing of the canal in February this year. Prior to this Putin had held frequent meetings on how to alleviate Crimea's water problems. At the moment there is no evidence on either side but Ukraine at least had the motives for this. Suggestion that this implies a scorched earth policy by Russia, indicating their imminent retreat come over as wishfull thinking and not much more than that.
I think that we have known for some time that blowing up the dam was a possibility. It was shown by tests that a missile strike wouldn't destroy it, and all reports say it was an internal blast that broke it.
You must log in or register to see images