Summer tranfers

[Saf]

Not really mate, it's all gone quiet since the police said new evidence has come to their attention which meant all charges would be dropped.
Now i have no idea what that evidence is (maybe you do) but if it means they had to drop all charges then i find it hard to convict the boy.

I see one of two outcomes to this in the summer,
He will either end up on the club released list with little fanfare or appear on the club squad list with the same amount.

Because most people have now convicted him in their heads it would be very hard for him to play for the club again so the first option is most likely. he probably needs to start again at a European club.

There we have it.

You’re the only person I know of that thinks like that. Nobody cares about the police investigation. Everybody who has heard the audio, knows that Greenwood has raped her.

Everybody has condemned him for that. Morally that is the right thing to do.

You’re defending a rapist.

 

[Treble]

You do know that you don’t have to be found guilty of a crime to be in breach of your contract don’t you. Stepping outside of an agreed set of rules could be enough to have your contract terminated.
Also when it comes to employment law, Utd could have terminated his contract if it has concerns for its reputation, see Lafferty v Nuffield Health UKEAT/0006/19 as an example.
Therefore I suspect Sucky is probably closer to the truth than you’ve given him credit for.

This is a fair point.

Although in employment law there are other options employers can take instead of terminating a contract, even if found to be in breach.

They are also usually required to carry out an investigation whilst the employee is suspended.

Personally, I think he should never play for the club again, but if we're using employment law for one argument/outcome then it can be used for others if we're looking at it objectively.

 

[pieguts]

This is a fair point.

Although in employment law there are other options employers can take instead of terminating a contract, even if found to be in breach.

They are also usually required to carry out an investigation whilst the employee is suspended.

Personally, I think he should never play for the club again, but if we're using employment law for one argument/outcome then it can be used for others if we're looking at it objectively.

My comment was in response to Chief’s who said that sacking him wasn’t an option, this is clearly incorrect.
What Utd choose to do with him is down to Utd, hopefully they might consider what the Utd fans think if it is negative, but he’s there employee.

 

[Treble]

My comment was in response to Chief’s who said that sacking him wasn’t an option, this is clearly incorrect.
What Utd choose to do with him is down to Utd, hopefully they might consider what the Utd fans think if it is negative, but he’s there employee.

On Chief's point he quoted employment law and said he hasn't been found guilty because there is still no outcome from the investigation by the club.

If that is a course of action an employer takes then what Chief has said is correct.

 

[pieguts]

On Chief's point he quoted employment law and said he hasn't been found guilty in the investigation by the club. Yet.

If that is a course of action an employer takes then what Chief has said is correct.

IMO, that’s not what he implied but I really don’t care TBH, it’s Utd’s reputation at risk.

 

[Treble]

There is the little tiny issue of employment and/or contract law meaning he couldn't be sacked because he hasn't been found guilty of anything.

Perhaps?

But yeah, Sucky got this all correct as per absolutely every always time.

Looks like he implied it to me.

Like I said I think he should be kicked out, but the club have done nothing wrong. Certainly not when it comes to employment law.

 

[Tel (they/them)]

The Glazers will never sack him. I’d suspect a new owner might, and I think it would be a good way to kick off a new regime if they come in and had him moved out.

The fact is, if it was somebody like Brandon Williams that had done this we’d all want him booted out the club (cos he’s ****), even the Nigerians on Twitter who want Greenwood Knighted.

 

[Sucky]

 

[Saf]

Look what you've caused Sucky

 

[Sucky]

Look what you've caused Sucky

Diego shoulda shut his mouf innit

 

[Saf]

Diego shoulda shut his mouf innit

If he's consistent with his thoughts and not just defending rapist Greenwood because he's a Man Utd player then he must also defend child abuser Jimmy Saville who was also interviewed but not charged.

Let's see.

 

[Spurlock]

What does 'rge' mean?

 

[Chief]

My comment was in response to Chief’s who said that sacking him wasn’t an option, this is clearly incorrect.
What Utd choose to do with him is down to Utd, hopefully they might consider what the Utd fans think if it is negative, but he’s there employee.

Care to quote this?

Cheers.

 

[Chief]

IMO, that’s not what he implied but I really don’t care TBH, it’s Utd’s reputation at risk.

You don't have the first ****ing clue what I was implying. You know **** all about me, or what I think.

 

[Chief]

What does 'rge' mean?

Its code for THE

Dont tell no one

 

[haslam]

Do you think "don't tell know one" means I have to tell someone. That's my interpretation.

 

[Chief]

He could mean don't tell No.one. Whoever number one is?

Sucky was having a bad day, as the title is tranfers.

Stoned probs.

 

[Spurlock]

Just gonna chill on this thread for a bit

 

[Sucky]

Just gonna chill on this thread for a bit

Same

Will Update with some transfer rumours soon enough.

 

[haslam]

Same

Will Update with some transfer rumours soon enough.

Save yourself the time and effort. Liverpool in the market:

1 - be linked with overpriced ballers and not buy them as they're too expensive.

2 - spend £100m+ (£250m with add-ons) on very good players you don't need but ignore gaping holes in the team

3 - watch Klopp cry about not having any money to spend and "ceilings"