Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
brb said:
I get people have underlying medical conditions, that within time may lead to their death. I feel for me the question here is did those people die as only a result of their underlying medical condition OR did they die because the vaccine in some way exacerbated their underlying medical condition/symptoms. Are the medical professionals seeing an increase in patients due to certain symptoms, but are just blaming people delaying in receiving treatment or blaming xyz as long as they don't blame v. Don't mention the v word for vaccine!
Click to expand...

spot on dude these questions need answers but parliament walked out on our behalf the bunch of fking puppets

2+2=5 ****s is what they are
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
The worrying thing is even though they know for a fact deaths rates are out of hand, they are still pushing the jab on kids ffs

scary stuff hey glad mine ain’t had it I tell thee
 
luvgonzo said:
There's going to be a lack of evidence though as they just label the deaths as nothing to do with and vaccines and do nothing to really investigate the instances of perfectly healthy people dropping dead.
Click to expand...

Going by what Bridgen was saying, what you can do is take the existing data he was quoting and break it down into deaths, serious illnesses and those who just had extended stays in hospital. All of that is already recorded.

Then correlate each against how many had each of the vaccines. That way you could isolate the excess deaths into those who have died having taken each vaccine and compare it to excess deaths for ppl who haven't. IF there's a clear disproportionate difference between the different groups, then ppl like Bridgen will have evidence to suggest there's a bigger problem. But atm his conclusions are just too woolly and don't show or prove anything, that was my only point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peej, aberdude and luvgonzo
Treble said:
Going by what Bridgen was saying, what you can do is take the existing data he was quoting and break it down into deaths, serious illnesses and those who just had extended stays in hospital. All of that is already recorded.

Then correlate each against how many had each of the vaccines. That way you could isolate the excess deaths into those who have died having taken each vaccine and compare it to excess deaths for ppl who haven't. IF there's a clear disproportionate difference between the different groups, then ppl like Bridgen will have evidence to suggest there's a bigger problem. But atm his conclusions are just too woolly and don't show or prove anything, that was my only point.
Click to expand...

But in the real world me and luv are both seeing a high levels of not old nor unhealthy die pretty suddenly……..we don’t need a graph to figure out something is up let me tell you

if most English also lived in a society like me and luv where bad news travels fast and the likelyhood to know them is high then you would probably be witnessing the same situation as us and you wouldn’t need a pretty graph either
 
Treble said:
Going by what Bridgen was saying, what you can do is take the existing data he was quoting and break it down into deaths, serious illnesses and those who just had extended stays in hospital. All of that is already recorded.

Then correlate each against how many had each of the vaccines. That way you could isolate the excess deaths into those who have died having taken each vaccine and compare it to excess deaths for ppl who haven't. IF there's a clear disproportionate difference between the different groups, then ppl like Bridgen will have evidence to suggest there's a bigger problem. But atm his conclusions are just too woolly and don't show or prove anything, that was my only point.
Click to expand...


His stance is, he believes that there are a large number of vaccine injured. So stop the jabs u til you prove him wrong, same with Malhotra and Le Tissier(more on that crackpot right wing nutter later)
His Adjournment debate was a sly move, nobody is required to attend these except the person his question:comment is made towards.
 
Peej said:
His stance is, he believes that there are a large number of vaccine injured. So stop the jabs u til you prove him wrong, same with Malhotra and Le Tissier(more on that crackpot right wing nutter later)
His Adjournment debate was a sly move, nobody is required to attend these except the person his question:comment is made towards.
Click to expand...
I don't know much about him tbh, to me though we're out of the Pandemic but still no stringent testing? Didn't they combine 2 jabs and just test it on rats and not on humans?
 
Peej said:
His stance is, he believes that there are a large number of vaccine injured. So stop the jabs u til you prove him wrong, same with Malhotra and Le Tissier(more on that crackpot right wing nutter later)
His Adjournment debate was a sly move, nobody is required to attend these except the person his question:comment is made towards.
Click to expand...

I don't really care what he wants, or when/where he raised it in the HOC, that's irrelevant. He clearly has access to ppl and organisations capable of researching the figures further. I don't see why the data can't be scrutinised to show numbers linking the original jab/boosters to deaths, serious side effects, and then comparing to other vaccines or to ppl who have suffered the same conditions or died without the vaccine. Others will come on board if you do that and then you can put pressure on the system (parliament, media, pharma) to at least listen to the data. Or the opposite might happen and they could show the vaccines don't have any more negative impact than any other vaccine, or no vaccine.

I've got an open mind on it either way. Surely the point is to find the truth and save lives one way or the other. Or are ppl just happy to carry on the pissing contest with claims and counterclaims, and the ppl dying/ suffering these serious side effects aren't really important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
Treble said:
I don't really care what he wants, or when/where he raised it in the HOC, that's irrelevant. He clearly has access to ppl and organisations capable of researching the figures further. I don't see why the data can't be scrutinised to show numbers linking the original jab/boosters to deaths, serious side effects, and then comparing to other vaccines or to ppl who have suffered the same conditions or died without the vaccine. Others will come on board if you do that and then you can put pressure on the system (parliament, media, pharma) to at least listen to the data. Or the opposite might happen and they could show the vaccines don't have any more negative impact than any other vaccine, or no vaccine.

I've got an open mind on it either way. Surely the point is to find the truth and save lives one way or the other. Or are ppl just happy to carry on the pissing contest with claims and counterclaims, and the ppl dying/ suffering these serious side effects aren't really important.
Click to expand...


This is what I have just said, he claims he has evidence of vaccine injury/death and asks for the vaccines to stop until proven otherwise. But he hasn’t put anything forward.
 
Treble said:
the ppl dying/ suffering these serious side effects aren't really important.
Click to expand...

Again I will say this doesn’t need sides especially them that have taken the vaccine in good faith which are now dead or seriously injured with life changing consequences……again I will repeat these are the same type people as peej and most of you on this site……….do you really wanna be ignored just because you wanna try prove a point to people like me who didn’t take it

thing is most are leaning towards the fk that jab again

I wonder why hey
 
Peej said:
This is what I have just said, he claims he has evidence of vaccine injury/death and asks for the vaccines to stop until proven otherwise. But he hasn’t put anything forward.
Click to expand...

you did say it but in spastic fashion
 
Died suddenly.

You must log in or register to see media

this is the grifting mindset. Post a story and a one word highlight ‘ this’

a 3 year old ‘died suddenly’ so links the covid conspiracy video and makes people think his death was related to his vaccination status. Well, under 3s we’re not vaccinated, this lad wasn’t vaccinated.
A tragic loss used to whip up hysteria in the anti vaxx mob.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back