Match of the Day

So people who do one or more of the following: illegally entering the country, sexually abusing children, killing people and blowing up children isnt important?

 

This one? I already gave it a reply petal.

 

Nope not this one.... And how is that response by me any sort of answer to the question you asked? Stop looking for something isn't there! I'll re quote it for you....

 

what are his 'employment conditions'?
he isnt even an employee
he has a freelance contract
I doubt you are privy to it

 

This one Syd....

 

Ta, as I can't see any other meaningful response quoting my question from you.

 

That fine we don't have to agree. Despite what people seem to think on here sometimes. They would though because they have to be impartial.

It is hypothetical but it was you who raised the question.

 

Obviously I don't-watch Clarkson as I am not a bellend. Clarkson's own daughter thinks he is a bellend, and no, my daughters don't think I am a bellend.


Is wstch a song by the Village People?

 

And neither are you so stop claiming to be.

Given the precedent with other BBC presenters is much stronger than any guesstimation of his contract I'm going to go with the precedent.

 

No I asked if he'd supported the current government, not spoken out against a hypothetical Labour government.

You know, the current government that other BBC presenters have spoken out in support of with no recrimination. That's a bit less hypothetical.

 

You obviously didnt understand what we were talking about
We were discussing whether he was talking nonsense or not
The BBC doesnt care whether he talks sense or nonsense but they do care if he's being impartial or not

 

Oh do they? That's interesting to hear. I'm glad you're across what they care about. Could you let me know what they thought of Sugar's tweets about Corbyn which included a cartoon of him in Hitler's car?

 

Supporting a party, or government, is different to comparing one you don't support to Nazi's is it not?

 

You're mistakingly thinking that's the reason this has suddenly become issue number one for this lot.

If they care about all that then there are bigger fish to fry that some boat people.

They're trying to win votes. They haven't got the answers. This is much easier.

 

Quoted In the post directly above this one of yours

 

That's not really an answer to what I said is it?

 

Thanks, I've already previously responded to this.

 

Why did the BBC say that Lineker had breached their impartiality guidelines?
It would appear that they are mentioned in his contract

You said: "And neither are you so stop claiming to be."
When did I claim to be privy to what is in his contract?
In fact I made it clear that I didnt know what is in his contract.

I said: "I dont know what is in his contract" see my comment #96

 

Fair enough, must have missed it, let me guess....you don't agree and think he would have been taken off for posting a tweet simply saying he didn't agree with the policy