Amad

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hudson92 said:
Just hope to god this doesn’t mean we stick Pritch wide again
Click to expand...

I would have Pritchard wither in a number 10 role or on the bench with the possibility of coming on as an impact sub, he should be up for this one but that in itself could cause issues defensively if he is trying to force something in attack. We need to go back to basics, be stronger in midfield with Roberts on the right and Clarke on the left.

Also depends on which other attacking players we want on the pitch at the same time as shoehorning them all in doesn't work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hudson92 and clockstander
Pritch has been poor of late, maybe move Dan further forward or try one of the new lads in their, if Amad is out. Amad has his critics , but watching him in the cool light of day, he never stops trying or disappears over the 90 minutes , not sure the same can be said of any of the other regulars up front tbh, its a real selection dilemma for Tony this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell, FellTop, Montysoptician and 1 other person
monty987 said:
roll on the summer transfer window now how we got to 49 points i don't know, so thanks to all for the first 35 games.
Click to expand...

Because they have only just started playing poorly. Up until then defeats were very narrow and could have gone either way (with the exception of Burnley).

Before anyone says I know its Monty don't engage him as he won't reply etc... but if I've said it once I've said it a million times I can't ignore him all the time!
 
Blond Bombshell said:
So after all of that it was fatigue. Brilliant.... needed dropping after the last four poor games.
Click to expand...
Mowbray said yesterday that he got a knock in training but the scans came back clear. He was desperate for a rest, probably would’ve got that yesterday regardless of the slight injury worry or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blond Bombshell
Mackem-Tiz said:
Personally I think his apparent replacement Lihadji needs more game time so he hits the ground running at start of next season.
Click to expand...
I thought I heard that Ba is Amad replacement, Lihadji is Thierry Henry, possibly playing the 10 to LND
 
LD19SAFC said:
Mowbray said yesterday that he got a knock in training but the scans came back clear. He was desperate for a rest, probably would’ve got that yesterday regardless of the slight injury worry or not.
Click to expand...


"He was desperate for a rest" where did this information come from ? genuine interest .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back