It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree because its matter of fac. If he picked Dubravka this could not have happened .. that's a fact. The reason was to avoid this situation
No I'm not wrong hindsight is irrelevant to a matter of fact argument. If he'd picked dubs the situation where dubs and Pope were not available because of a red card was not possible... that is a fact and was a fact before kick off.
Keeper is the last player that needs to be rested, Pope's fault and can't blame Howe for that. BTW just realised we have City next fs
That's all very nice to know but not the point. If he picked dubs this could not have happened correct? That's all I've been saying What you're doing is providing an explanation why he chose another option which i don't disagree with
So why you not saying he should have rested Joelinton considering he came off with a possible injury? Why risk Wilson and his dodgy hamstring? Etc etc
Soo you’d potentially damage the careers of those u19 players just to potentially avoid missing one senior player in the final?
Pope could have had an accident in the changing rooms as he was encouraging Dubs and broke his leg. Could that have happened? Yes or no?
That's very nice but I said red card. Why is it people struggle with matter of fact so much. You're not bright enough or you're winding me up.
No Im not debating reasons or rights and wrong involved in howes decision. I'm pointing out a matter of fact.
