Yep, he's good at defensive side as well but it's his quality on the ball which makes him standout. Lovely little player.
little is a very good word to describe him. he's not tall. not a huge issue par se if fabinho can play beside him but we do need to acknowledge we need to cover that aspect as well.
hmmmm.. wheres his contract at, 2024? I think cheslea have never backed him. hes also been overpaid. power still with Chelsea? I think he's decent, I think he'd be over priced though.
I've actually been a little disappointed with Pulisic in the Prem.........thought he would have made a bigger impact
cheslea don't back anyone. just don't. if they had a better attitude to players and managers while demanding high performance they'd have won far more since 2004. As it stands their tactics win them enough given the cash look at de bruyne and salah. theres loads of exmaples of decent players they grab then chuck aside.
Klopp was interested in him while he (Pulisic) was at Dortmund and I think it was rumoured at the time that he would come to us but chose Chelsea. I do think he would have fared better under Klopp.
Have to agree. We tolerated mane missing 3 out of 4 every game here. Werner made a complete **** of it joining chelski
Whatever happens tonight I just think we have to pay what it takes for Amrabat. ****ing beast and quick (then he gives the ball away). Still mean it though. We could play 4-3-3 and the other two midfielders could go where they want, and Trent could go walkabout too.
Problem is judging on World Cup performances. We’ve been there with Diouf and diao after Senegal did well.
Diao was a decent player, not amazing but a decent squad player. Diouf was a disgrace of a human being, not just as a footballer. We also bought Berger off the back of Euro96 and he was alright.
