Off Topic OLOF's political thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If you say so...not many posters on here are as self depreciating as you

You must suffer from severe low self esteem.
Completely the opposite but I do realise you are full of wind and piss
Possibly not the piss as you’ve used it up in the wind, bet your a bit like a wet lettuce by now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
This guy's saying that the first amendment was broken by the Democrat party but I'm not seeing how that could be the case?

First Amendment
First Amendment Explained


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

But I'm no constitution lawyer
 
This guy's saying that the first amendment was broken by the Democrat party but I'm not seeing how that could be the case?

First Amendment
First Amendment Explained


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

But I'm no constitution lawyer
your joking right, or do you always only see what you want to
 
your joking right, or do you always only see what you want to
No, I'm not arguing about the rights or wrongs of what could be on his laptop it's that the first amendment protects freedom of speech and so restricts the government from passing laws to inhibit this. In the case of Twitter the then owners decided, at the request of a democrat party official, to not publish certain information. In the same way the owners of Fox news decided to publish lots of information about this laptop. Personal choice "freedom" of the owners of these two corporations, unfettered by government regulations, to do as they choose. Personally I think there should be laws requiring less bias but I suspect I'm on a loser there.
 
Last edited:
Completely the opposite....

Whatever but that completely contrary to your posts.


...but I do realise you are full of wind and piss
Possibly not the piss as you’ve used it up in the wind, bet your a bit like a wet lettuce by now

Perhaps you shouldn't be so quick in admitting flaws in your mental thought processing

Stick to admitting that conversing with you is akin to pissing in the wind....
 
polly syndrome runs in his family
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images

Whoops, seems that the plastic paratroopers teddy is in the corner again...

You must log in or register to see images
 
Whoops, seems that the plastic paratroopers teddy is in the corner again...

You must log in or register to see images
ill bow to the professor of bullshits knowledge on the subject. have you no shame when everybody is ignoring you
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
No, I'm not arguing about the rights or wrongs of what could be on his laptop it's that the first amendment protects freedom of speech and so restricts the government from passing laws to inhibit this. In the case of Twitter the then owners decided, at the request of a democrat party official, to not publish certain information. In the same way the owners of Fox news decided to publish lots of information about this laptop. Personal choice "freedom" of the owners of these two corporations, unfettered by government regulations, to do as they choose. Personally I think there should be laws requiring less bias but I suspect I'm on a loser there.
big difference between democrats pushing bullshit knowing it to be untrue and lying that its Russian misinformation, knowing the laptop is true. The laptop was handed to the FBI in 2019, the same as they did with H.Clintons masterclass of lies about Trump collusion with Russia 3 years at a cost of millions knowing it to be lies, illegal fisa reports to get search warrants.they are worse than the CCP and the worst part is Gullible little Polly believes every word of bullshit fed to him, then has the audacity to disrupt this thread with his diet of
codswallop
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Diego