You must log in or register to see media
Seems absurdly early to be making any concrete commitments on a manifesto. Hopefully this is just a tactic to ensure the right wing gutter press doesn’t get two years of screaming “they can’t win properly so want to change the rules”. Which you know will be the narrativeShame, but not unexpected. Can but hope Labour are forced into a change by the need for a coalition after the next general election.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...post-voting-system?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Could well be, there's a need for PR, how it's going to be achieved is another thing.Seems absurdly early to be making any concrete commitments on a manifesto. Hopefully this is just a tactic to ensure the right wing gutter press doesn’t get two years of screaming “they can’t win properly so want to change the rules”. Which you know will be the narrative
Too many easy points are scored against labour for not being patriotic. Better to reduce the lines of attack. And perhaps suggest a different national anthem as legislation since the issue appears to be the subject of the anthem and not the notion of singing oneThe Labour Party's National Conference was required to sing the National Anthem today, for the first time in its history.
Keir Hardy's quote, from 1897.
"Even under a representative system of government it is possible to paralyse a nation by maintaining the fiction that a reigning family is a necessity of good government. Now, one of two things must be – either the British people are fit to govern themselves or they are not. If they are, an hereditary ruler who in legislation has more power than the whole nation is an insult. Despotism and monarchy are compatible; democracy and monarchy are an unthinkable connection.
If we are for the Queen we are not for her subjects. The throne represents the power of caste – class rule. Round the throne gather the unwholesome parasites who cling to the system which lends itself to their disordered condition. The toady who crawls through the mire of self-abasement to enable him to bask in the smile of royalty is the victim of a diseased organism. No healthy, well-developed people could for one moment tolerate an institution which belongs to the childhood of the race, and which in these latter days is the centre, if not the source, of the corrupting influences which constitute Society.
The great mind, the strong heart, the detestation of wrong, the love of truth whether in cot or palace will always command my respect. But to worship an empty form, to make pretence to believe a gilded mediocrity indispensable to the well-being of the nation – where is the man who will so far forget what is due to his manhood?
In this country loyalty to the Queen is used by the profit-mongers to blind the eyes of the people. We can have but one feeling in the matter – contempt for thrones and for all who bolster them up."
I would most definitely support a change that was supportive of the nation over the support of an entitled person/family.Too many easy points are scored against labour for not being patriotic. Better to reduce the lines of attack. And perhaps suggest a different national anthem as legislation since the issue appears to be the subject of the anthem and not the notion of singing one
Angela Rayner’s summary of the Tory party.
You must log in or register to see images
A sad reality of the left - determined to cannibalise themselves in the pursuit of ideological purity.And yet despite all that, Labour are going to get hung up about singing the National Anthem at their conference.
And yet despite all that, Labour are going to get hung up about singing the National Anthem at their conference.