Running out of time for this morning announcement, need to be able to justify not having done any work
You'll get over it.
No from Mobray yesterday morning at the AOL.where did he get mannone from? rtg?
Is it happening?No from Mobray yesterday morning at the AOL.
It's a backward move if you ask me
Disagree, his experience will be invaluable for Patto and Bass to learn from and gives us an option of a proven safe pair of hands if Patto goes downNo from Mobray yesterday morning at the AOL.
It's a backward move if you ask me
One step at a time.You'll get over it.
Add in he appeared to love his time here, doesn't have an ego and seems to be a decent ladDisagree, his experience will be invaluable for Patto and Bass to learn from and gives us an option of a proven safe pair of hands if Patto goes down
No from Mobray yesterday morning at the AOL.
It's a backward move if you ask me
I don't think anything is absolutely essential today for us. Retaining our players is the most important thing.
Mannone as experienced cover would be nice but he's a free agent so it doesn't need to be resolved today.
A centre back or right back would be decent depending on whether we're planning to play 3 or 4 at the back. But if it doesn't come off, O'Nien has earned his chance anyway.
A combative midfielder who is ready to play immediately would be a boost, but we have enough numbers to make it work if not. 1 in with Matete out on loan and Winchester allowed to leave permanently would be ideal.
Another striker option is never a bad thing, but we've got plenty of flexibility in the wide and number 10 position to change things around up front where necessary.
Anything will be a bonus.
I think he meant no to if he got the info off RTG.Sorry marra....are you saying Mowbray said no to Mannone coming? And,in your opinion,what's a backward move...him coming or him not coming?
No from Mobray yesterday morning at the AOL.
It's a backward move if you ask me
Im on the fence regarding Styles
No defence for a statement like that.You'll get over it.
Got to be honest, I don't think any journalist will rely on the veracity of anonymous 'ITKs' on an internet fans forum.I'm just saying - your post was that Nixon knows nowt and only hears stuff on 606 and RTG - so I asked if this one was from RTG and you said no he heard it from Mowbray.
So Nixon does know a bit more than nowt.
I think he meant no to if he got the info off RTG.
Got to be honest, I don't think any journalist will rely on the veracity of anonymous 'ITKs' on an internet fans forum.