The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 29th August)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Apart from the 500k a week he’s reportedly on.

And they're trying to sign Sidibe who was at Monaco last season, Josh Browler from Blackpool and Cody Gapko as well. I reckon there A few more that aren't known to the press. I reckon they'll have 20 plus players by the end of Thursday.
 
Whose going to be runners up this season cause Man City will walk it and that colossus will score 40 goals maybe

I had the top 4 as

Man City
Liverpool
Spurs
Chelsea

But I think Arsenal are going to be top 4 by the end of the Season. Possibly 2nd.

I don't think Man City are as invincible as people make out. Newcastle managed to get 3 past them last weekend and they shipped in a few this weekend.
 
I may be wrong but I dont see Gnonto coming as think it will cause problems in the camp. Like Wakey says where does it leave 20yo Joffy because little Willy will get in ahead of Joffy and Willie is only 18yo. We already have 2 18yo kids in Sonny Perkins and Mateo Joseph Fernandez pushing. Will they accept Willie?

Still time to move on Bogusz 21yo, McCalmont 22yo.

Can we rely on Ayling to walk back in as a starter or back up to Kristensen? Because we could end up selling Drameh

I don't give a **** about upsetting Joffy, he's signed a professional contract and should act like one. If better is available he should be fighting for his place. This goes for everyone in my opinion <ok>
 
Yeah they've got Haaland up front but they've had to come from behind in their last 2 days. Newcastle carved their defence apart last weekend. If Haaland gets injured or his form falters then it's bye bye top spot.
he is made of stronger stuff
Not like Bamford and KP who is injured again what a good job we sold him when we did ,He has played 1 minute for City this season
 
Haaland missed 16 games for Dortmund due to injury last season.

Season before, injury meant he missed 10 games, and season before that he missed 7 games because of injury, so it looks like he is becoming more injury prone.

By the time he gets to Bamford's age, he might be managing to play one game per season :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Last edited:
I don't give a **** about upsetting Joffy, he's signed a professional contract and should act like one. If better is available he should be fighting for his place. This goes for everyone in my opinion <ok>

Spot on bucks. If he’s good enough he plays. Having a rep for giving youth a chance is one thing. Basing your recruitment strategy on the hope an injury prone (to date) young prospect has a ‘breakthrough’ year is another. It’s management by hope.

Get yourself a balanced squad and what happens happens.
 
They need to stray up or these players must have relegation clauses, be that release or reduced wages.

I reckon they'll need to stay on for financial security. Lingard is on £200k a week. Gibbs-White cost them over £40 million. They've managed to keep their hands on Johnson. They've brought in so many players and they've spent over £130 million this summer alone. I reckon that they've taken out some loans to get this many players and I reckon they're not finished yet as they've not made the 25 men needed.
 
Someone please explain the logic in loaning him to Spurs or anyone. We've still a small squad and can't reduce it further surely
Think more people believe this was £25m wasted on a Bielsa whim, and that cash could have been spent better on a player who could have helped last season. Dan James didnt help and some could say compounded problems we already had by insisting on playing him even if out of position. I do see your point of view though Eire
 
Think more people believe this was £25m wasted on a Bielsa whim, and that cash could have been spent better on a player who could have helped last season. Dan James didnt help and some could say compounded problems we already had by insisting on playing him even if out of position. I do see your point of view though Eire
But we lose a player who, whether you rate him or not, is an important part of team/squad and we get nothing as he's going on loan at a time when were crying out to strengthen areas. Im not a bit impressed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aski