Bumbling along and finishing around 16th is far too dangerous for my liking.
Yep. But at least we'd understand what their playing at. I guess it's a gamble every which way.
Bumbling along and finishing around 16th is far too dangerous for my liking.
Yep. But at least we'd understand what their playing at. I guess it's a gamble every which way.
I do know that yes, but at 34 and desperate to play he won't be asking the earth. He shouldn't be taking minutes away from Armstrong either as I'd have Armstrong coming on in games after 55 or 60 mins, Dykes would be behind both of them. I simply can't understand why anyone would want to see Dykes continue to miss chance after chance instead of a proven goalscorer in this league !
Whatever the question is.... grabbon is not the answer....
What like Hendrick !Could it be contractual? 'If fit, must play...'
You forget to mention when Grabban was ruled out for the season ! HandyYou assume he won't be asking for much. To compare and contrast, Grabban scored 12 goals in 32 games last year for a team that won the playoffs finishing 4th. Dykes got 9 in 33 for a team that finished 11th. Dykes isn't the answer, but I'm not seeing loads to say that signing 34 year old Grabban is the answer either. It really isn't that easy.
Yeah, to Watford probably unfortunately. The same as DavisHe isn't the answer, prefer to see Bonne than Grabban, given little opportunity and has looked lively when coming on. Does Sarr to Villa free up Archer for a loan move?
Does that free up Sarr to score a hat trick on Saturday then!You must log in or register to see images
Archer won't be going out on loan now then
Almost certainly , although in some places it says the deal has been resurrected and he's having a medical there. Who knows what to believe, I doubt we'd get Archer even if he goes there unfortunately.Does that free up Sarr to score a hat trick on Saturday then!
They’re saying MB is tapping up some manager guy called Gerrard for some youth playersAlmost certainly , although in some places it says the deal has been resurrected and he's having a medical there. Who knows what to believe, I doubt we'd get Archer even if he goes there unfortunately.
Whoopee do, is that the remit now or persevere with our own ones ? The only positions we need are in back up when everyone's fit except up top, and as much as I'd like Archer he's not an out and out striker. He'd still be better up top than what we've got but I don't see it happening. It's just perfect rumour mill fodder for Les and the board as the hours to deadline day slowly tick by. Brom are in talks with Grabban at the moment, yet another striker Bruce would have had pass through his ranks! Must be up to about 8 now and he still can't work out who to play.They’re saying MB is tapping up some manager guy called Gerrard for some youth players![]()
Getting young players in from other clubs is all well and good but for what purpose? And what is our end game? Is it an admission that our own youth set up isn't up to scratch?Whoopee do, is that the remit now or persevere with our own ones ? The only positions we need are in back up when everyone's fit except up top, and as much as I'd like Archer he's not an out and out striker. He'd still be better up top than what we've got but I don't see it happening. It's just perfect rumour mill fodder for Les and the board as the hours to deadline day slowly tick by. Brom are in talks with Grabban at the moment, yet another striker Bruce would have had pass through his ranks! Must be up to about 8 now and he still can't work out who to play.
Well if we’ve settled for 16th place what’s the point of taking other youth players? May as well make decisions on our own youth players. We seem to have a handful who are not making it to the bench - even after seasons out on loan to develop. Hard choices need to be made and bring in new.Getting young players in from other clubs is all well and good but for what purpose? And what is our end game? Is it an admission that our own youth set up isn't up to scratch?
Getting one top class youngster on loan to make a challenge is totally different to getting 3 or 4 just to fill positions. It smacks of desperation to me, it could do more long term harm than good. 2 or 3 youngsters from Villa isn't the answer but I suppose that depends on the question to start with.
We haven't. There's a difference between being cost conscious and being able but unwilling to spend more than just enough to survive. The fact we may end up there does not mean anyone, from fan to owner, will be happy with such an outcomeWell if we’ve settled for 16th place what’s the point of taking other youth players? May as well make decisions on our own youth players. We seem to have a handful who are not making it to the bench - even after seasons out on loan to develop. Hard choices need to be made and bring in new.