Alex Bruce was probably 5th/6th choice CB for most of his time at City and there were long periods he rightly didn’t get a look in. The role in the middle of three at the back suited him, and he rarely had a bad game there. People are forgetting him having Suarez in his pocket when we beat Liverpool. Also the cup final, where he was in contention for M of M. Suggesting he sold Cairney and played Livermore at RB solely to give Alex a game is absolutely ridiculous, but why let the truth get in the way of a good story? He probably filled in in midfield in a few games usually to do a marking job on a specific player.
I do also recall the ‘games won vs lost when he played/didn’t’ argument, as well as the counter which clearly showed he was playing against the top half teams ( generally when Bruce was reverting to three at the back).
Unfortunately he was the Managers son and will always be a target for those with an agenda against his dad. He wasn’t the best player in the squad (which then made it tricky for both), but certainly not the worst and rarely let us down.
Steve Bruce was criticised for rotating in the Europa league, but most clubs of similar standing (ie amongst the favourites to go down) did similar. I also,recall the following season(?) Burnley having a bit of a run in that cup, but ended up seriously adrift at the bottom of the league. They relied on a miracle escape from relegation when they were a top half team.
The season, we were relegated was mainly because we had a ridiculous amount of injuries (not just in number, but whenever a player hit form). I researched this ages ago for a similar debate and recall while we weren’t the highest number of injuries in the league, those who had more were far better equipped. All immediate rivals (with similar squads) had amongst the least.