You're lucky that people who give a **** are here to make sure you get the facts, yep. Unless of course, you know something that current scientific consensus doesn't know and would like to share it?
“If Roman grow grape in York 2,000 year ago, why is global warming made by man?” Important questions asked by the brain trust.
Or have enjoyed the benefits fossil fuels brought mankind, which seem to get missed off the risk assessment calculations.
I wasn't the one conflating, and you seem to have now over compensated by diverging. It's not a good look for someone claiming to be expressing facts.
So, in order to raise climate change awareness, you must have a net zero carbon footprint, as opposed to just making sure you use as little as possible?
Must you? I don't see anyone on here but you claiming that. I just see people pointing out that your simplistic opinion isn't the only opinion.
Diverging from what? You said I was conflating things, I responded in an effort to clear that up for you, you said I must be replying to somebody else, I said I wasn't. If I've diverged it's because you keep replying
Yes. Grew up in a council house wih one open coal fire, i remember the introduction of smokeless zones and having to buy cleaner burning fuels. When i left school in the late 1970s i didnt know anyone who had even been to a foreign country let alone been on a plane. Having a car was a luxury that few on our street had. And yet here we are today been told by the kids that we are responsible for the climate emergency as they sit by their wood burning stove looking out at their two cars in the driveway planning their next foreign holiday.