I wouldn't pray myself, but there are others that would. That doesn't mean that they'd be right though, does it? You don't really have a point, do you?
I'm not afraid to look, but you appear to be afraid to actually say what you're claiming. If everyone answered your questions by saying, "The answer's in a book", then I'm sure you'd accuse them of being evasive.
I consider god botherers and gays the same, as long as they don t shove it in my face they can get on with it
Everyone is guilty of war ffs We are built for it We crave it That's why everyone in the World plays MW3
i am categorically stating that any discussion with you is futile. based on previous exchanges you were vociferous in your views. i offeredto take you ersonally to the object of your obsession, guaranteeing a response to your questions you have declined but continued with your assertions. which imo negates any further offerings in terms of evidence on my part as based on previous information, the nature of your questions is not for the purpose of arriving to a conclusion but for the sake of continuing with assertions and questions
Isn't science all about what some **** wrote in a book? Isn't most science just theory that someone believes in?
in essence its people ridiculing those who choose to follow the law/rule as set by a superior entity by following the rules/laws set by people they have elevated to being superior it is this inferiority complex that leads to the mockery and self importance, yet never actually adressing their own beliefs
Yet when they have a theory and believe they have proven it to be true they state it as fact.....then someone smarter proves them wrong with another theory So I disagree, theory is belief, science runs on theory
not sure i agree, if i understood right science is not free from belief. and it certainly isnt free from 'making things fit'
uh oh now the word play on what is scientific theory starts yet if words are explained for religious purposes its 'interpretation' and 'excuses' etc its like the adage goes they accept biology but use physics to explain it, or some thing like that basically if you cant answer something, make up a theory so the eye got darwin thinking about his theory, so they invented another process to explain it, but use this as a way of making his early theory fit.
I can see what you two are saying, science is alot more of this is true until proven otherwise, so would be foolish to 100% believe it however atleast it does objective tests not based on ego's or money or power. Its an educated theory, based on observations of physical things that exist or have existed!
No replies from agnostics 'cos they can't make up their mind what to type, too busy hedging their bets. Believing in "something" but not having a clue what it is just sounds weak. Have the courage of your convictions. No god. There, easy.
You don't know that as I do not either. I may personally believe that Creamola Foam provides the missing link to how it all started. Let's face it, it's as believable as a God, Bing Bang bollocks or us being descended from aliens from another universe. The fact is NO-ONE knows. Why can't people just accept that?
The irony of people moaning about the accuracy of science on modern computers appears to be lost on some people. Do us all a favour and throw your keyboards away. Pray for your comments to appear on here and see how you do.
why dont you make a computer appear out of nothing? last i checked they had a creator/s or i know drop a bomb, create a BIG BANG and see what appears as fireworks are easily available at the moment, try a BANGer
I've never claimed that anything came from nothing. You have, on the other hand. Computers have easily traced manufacturers. Universes? Not so much.
