He wasn't.
Yeah, it's that second phase of play rule.have to admit, I thought he was.
Yeah, it's that second phase of play rule.
He was beyond the last defender when Grealish played the ball but then the German defender deflected the ball creating a second phase in which Kane was not offside as he was put through by the German player.
Well we just got lucky.
Levy probably saying let's not be rash,The Premier League will discuss whether it should end its £43m six-year deal with Russian broadcaster Match TV at this week's annual general meeting.
The previous deal with Rambler was suspended in March following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
That contract expired at the end of the season, with one for the 2022-23 campaign set to begin in August.
Russian broadcast deal up for discussion
With no easing of the conflict in Ukraine, Premier League clubs must decide how to proceed on their Russian broadcast deal.
Match TV is owned by Gazprom Media, which is backed by the Russian government.
The length of the contract means it is more valuable than if it had just covered three years as is usually the case.
Under the circumstances, it is thought scrapping the deal altogether would be easier than suspending it, if the contractual position allows.
at least they are thinking about it init lol dicks

If the money was divided equally it would amount to £360K per club for each season of the contract.The Premier League will discuss whether it should end its £43m six-year deal with Russian broadcaster Match TV at this week's annual general meeting.
The previous deal with Rambler was suspended in March following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
That contract expired at the end of the season, with one for the 2022-23 campaign set to begin in August.
Russian broadcast deal up for discussion
With no easing of the conflict in Ukraine, Premier League clubs must decide how to proceed on their Russian broadcast deal.
Match TV is owned by Gazprom Media, which is backed by the Russian government.
The length of the contract means it is more valuable than if it had just covered three years as is usually the case.
Under the circumstances, it is thought scrapping the deal altogether would be easier than suspending it, if the contractual position allows.
at least they are thinking about it init lol dicks

If the money was divided equally it would amount to £360K per club for each season of the contract.
No that the amount of money should matter but yeh let's have a discussion about the implications of not honouring the contract. Honestly it they don't do the right thing we should all rip up our season tickets, cancel our Sky/BT direct debits and tell them all to fook right off.
You think Trippier is in Maddisons place?James Justin injured mate ... likely back for the next game ... Maddison obviously should be there but I'm not too fussed that he's not ... needs to recharge his batteries for the "finishing above the Toon predictably, yet again" forthcoming season ... but good to see that the understudy Trippier is getting a game as a result of his injury ... where is he playing these days now? ... that he's not good enough for a top 10 PL club?![]()
**** me Fosse, give up the pretence of football knowledgeYou think Trippier is in Maddisons place?
**** me Fosse, give up the pretence of football knowledge
... the clue was in the word "injury" ... 
You think Trippier is in Maddisons place?
**** me Fosse, give up the pretence of football knowledge
No, the clue was in the way you wrote itJustin you prize tit... the clue was in the word "injury" ...
![]()
I think he means in James Justins place

ShhhhhI think he means in James Justins place
No, the clue was in the way you wrote it![]()
