The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Goodlaw Project article on the initial refusal of any Partygate investigation:
https://goodlawproject.org/news/partygate-met-police-investigate/

"Their justification is itself remarkable. It includes reference to the fact that:

  • “Downing Street… have already stated that Covid rules were followed”
  • “anyone who was at the gathering would be entitled to refuse to answer questions because of the privilege against self-incrimination”
  • because the Cabinet Office was looking into possible breaches there was no need for the Met to investigate as well."

They said that they didn't do it and they're investigating themselves? Really? ****ing hell. <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
You must log in or register to see media

UK nationals have been told to leave Ukraine:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60355311

Well, that's just ****ing great, isn't it?
Luckily we don't have a clueless ****wit in charge who already advertised what our military manoeuvres are going to be at a press conference while there's also a Lassa fever outbreak back home that is no doubt being handwaved as a couple of aspirin and you're fine

...oh wait, I got that wrong didn't I?
 
Since when has a questionnaire been part of a police investigation ? Last time I had a brush with the law was 1977 on a camping holiday in Ilfracombe, after a day on the very cheap very very strong cider me and a couple of mates were chucked in the back of a police transit ,met with a hail of boots from the local boys and dropped off 5 miles outside town , all we were doing was having a party , Boris and his mob will be able to sit round a table with their lawyers and make up the perfect story
 
Since when has a questionnaire been part of a police investigation ? Last time I had a brush with the law was 1977 on a camping holiday in Ilfracombe, after a day on the very cheap very very strong cider me and a couple of mates were chucked in the back of a police transit ,met with a hail of boots from the local boys and dropped off 5 miles outside town , all we were doing was having a party , Boris and his mob will be able to sit round a table with their lawyers and make up the perfect story
He's got 50 to coordinate with and many of them will have been fired. If he lies and gets caught out it is obstruction of Justice. That could be custodial.
 
Since when has a questionnaire been part of a police investigation ? Last time I had a brush with the law was 1977 on a camping holiday in Ilfracombe, after a day on the very cheap very very strong cider me and a couple of mates were chucked in the back of a police transit ,met with a hail of boots from the local boys and dropped off 5 miles outside town , all we were doing was having a party , Boris and his mob will be able to sit round a table with their lawyers and make up the perfect story
Questionnaires are generally confined for eliciting information from potential witnesses to crime, not the criminals. <doh>

If there is justification in this instance, I can see no reason for not making the blank document public, to at least see the direction being taken. It would provide much needed transparency to a process that stinks of corruption.
 
The police should use 2 pieces of bread and a hungry police dog, put his old chap between the bread and say dinner fido , that should make him talk ( no bullshit Latin)
 
The police should use 2 pieces of bread and a hungry police dog, put his old chap between the bread and say dinner fido , that should make him talk ( no bullshit Latin)
As a dog lover I wouldn't want to risk poisoning the poor animal.
Two bricks would work equally well :emoticon-0148-yes: