wow, you get even worseGood, hopefully it sends a message out to thugs, that they can't assault people like that.
he didnt assault him
wow, you get even worseGood, hopefully it sends a message out to thugs, that they can't assault people like that.
how does this compare?Good, hopefully it sends a message out to thugs, that they can't assault people like that.
wow, you get even worse
he didnt assault him
how does this compare?
You must log in or register to see media
You are getting confused between Lewis Hughes who got a suspended sentence after admitting assault and Jonathan Chew who got 8 weeks for "intending to cause harassment, alarm or distress".They put him in a headlock.
He admitted assault at court.
How can you argue that isn't assault?
You are getting confused between Lewis Hughes who got a suspended sentence after admitting assault and Jonathan Chew who got 8 weeks for "intending to cause harassment, alarm or distress".
You are getting confused between Lewis Hughes who got a suspended sentence after admitting assault and Jonathan Chew who got 8 weeks for "intending to cause harassment, alarm or distress".
20's isn't necessarily incorrect. The apostrophe is generally considered to avoid confusion with mathematical representation.

Dont you understand that is the whole point I am makingWhy's he in prison then?
is there a crazed leftie who doesnt understand the difference between possessive and plural“20’s” is incorrect in this circumstance. This is a noun plural not a possessive or a contraction. It would be acceptable to put “’20s” if this were a reference to a year because the century part of the date had been omitted. If you meant to indicate that the years belonged to the twenties then “20s’” would have been correct.
Are you a greengrocer by trade? You could go to the foot of your apple’s and pear’s. It would be okay to have a butcher’s.![]()
I thought you would have him on ignore by nowDoes Sir Barrington Womble ever actually contribute anything worthwhile or is it all regurgitated Tweets from the same half dozen imbecile accounts on Twitter?
Tim Stanley made an interesting comment recentlyToday Boris was on a visit to North Wales, being as far away from Westminster as possible as he could go in case Sue Gray’s Report was released.
At the same time, the leader of the Opposition, Metropolitan Elite Remainer Sir Keir Starmer was on a visit to Grimsby, a seat that Labour lost to the Conservatives in 2019 because Boris said he would Get Brexit Done while Corbyn and Starmer dithered, ignoring the views of their core Northern voters. Grimsby voted over 70 per cent Leave in 2016 and Labour expected them to hang on to their Angela Rayner lite MP.
It was amusing to see Starmer on the local news visiting a micro brewery (presumably not to sample any of their wares) to tell how Labour was going to do a better job of “levelling up” than Boris. He just neglected to use the correct title: “levelling down”. As Boris is planning on harvesting a Magic Money Forest to turn the whole North Sea into a wind farm and Grimsby and Hull are both betting everything on the wind farm service industry, Labour needs to get planting some more Magic Money Trees to stay in the race to oblivion.
Does Sir Barrington Womble ever actually contribute anything worthwhile or is it all regurgitated Tweets from the same half dozen imbecile accounts on Twitter?
“20’s” is incorrect in this circumstance. This is a noun plural not a possessive or a contraction. It would be acceptable to put “’20s” if this were a reference to a year because the century part of the date had been omitted. If you meant to indicate that the years belonged to the twenties then “20s’” would have been correct.
Are you a greengrocer by trade? You could go to the foot of your apple’s and pear’s. It would be okay to have a butcher’s.![]()
how does this compare?
You must log in or register to see media